UK extends copyright protection

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK extends copyright protection

The UK has implemented a 2011 European directive extending copyright protection for sound recordings from 50 years to 70 years after the recording is made

Cliff Richard

The changes are brought in by the Copyright and Duration of Rights in Performances Regulations 2013, implementing EU Directive 2011/77/EU. The Regulations were made on July 17, laid before Parliament on July 18 and come into force today (November 1).

The Regulations also harmonise the length of copyright term for co-written works. The copyright will expire 70 years after the death of the last surviving author.

Additional measures introduced include:

  • A session fund, which will pay session musicians 20% of revenues from sales of their recordings;

  • A so-called clean slate provision, under which a producer may not make deductions from payment to performers; and

  • A use-it or lose-it clause, allowing performers and musicians to claim back their performance rights if they are not being commercially exploited.

The Directive was agreed following lobbying from European performers, many of whose rights were set to expire under the 50-year rule. Some people dubbed it the Cliff Richard law, after the performer (right).

It was controversial, as several studies (such as the Gowers Review) had recommended not changing the copyright term, and some member states – notably Belgium and Sweden – opposed it.

In a statement, Minister for IP Lord Younger said: “These changes demonstrate the Government`s ongoing commitment to, and support for, our creative industries - who are worth billions to our economy.”

Jo Dipple, chief executive of UK Music, said: “We are pleased that the Government is implementing changes that acknowledge the importance of copyright to performers and record companies. This change will mean creators can rightfully continue to make a living from their intellectual property and works.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Apple’s lawsuit against OpenAI, which features Tier 1-ranked disputes firms on both sides, reflects how trade secrets litigation is becoming a prominent competition feature
Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
Gift this article