UK extends copyright protection

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

UK extends copyright protection

The UK has implemented a 2011 European directive extending copyright protection for sound recordings from 50 years to 70 years after the recording is made

Cliff Richard

The changes are brought in by the Copyright and Duration of Rights in Performances Regulations 2013, implementing EU Directive 2011/77/EU. The Regulations were made on July 17, laid before Parliament on July 18 and come into force today (November 1).

The Regulations also harmonise the length of copyright term for co-written works. The copyright will expire 70 years after the death of the last surviving author.

Additional measures introduced include:

  • A session fund, which will pay session musicians 20% of revenues from sales of their recordings;

  • A so-called clean slate provision, under which a producer may not make deductions from payment to performers; and

  • A use-it or lose-it clause, allowing performers and musicians to claim back their performance rights if they are not being commercially exploited.

The Directive was agreed following lobbying from European performers, many of whose rights were set to expire under the 50-year rule. Some people dubbed it the Cliff Richard law, after the performer (right).

It was controversial, as several studies (such as the Gowers Review) had recommended not changing the copyright term, and some member states – notably Belgium and Sweden – opposed it.

In a statement, Minister for IP Lord Younger said: “These changes demonstrate the Government`s ongoing commitment to, and support for, our creative industries - who are worth billions to our economy.”

Jo Dipple, chief executive of UK Music, said: “We are pleased that the Government is implementing changes that acknowledge the importance of copyright to performers and record companies. This change will mean creators can rightfully continue to make a living from their intellectual property and works.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article