US government report targets software patents
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US government report targets software patents

Focus on the type of patent, rather than the identity of the litigant: that was the conclusion of a US Government Accountability Office report into patent litigation and patent quality published this week

The report, which was mandated under Section 34 of the America Invents Act, noted that lawsuits involving software-related patents accounted for about 89% of the increase in defendants between 2007 and 2011. It added that most of the suits brought by so-called patent monetisation entities involved software-related patents.

In 2011 patents related to software made up more than half of all patents issued in the United States.

The report concluded that a focus on whether the litigants are operating or non-operating companies, individual inventors or big companies etc, may be “misplaced”.

The GAO welcomed the USPTO’s recent efforts “to work with the software industry to more uniformly define software terminology and make it easier to identify relevant patents and patent owners”.

It also recommended that the USPTO consider examining trends in patent infringement litigation, including the types of patents and issues in dispute, and consider linking this information to internal data on patent examination to improve the quality of issued patents and the patent examination process.

That was the only recommendation made in the report.

In a response, Teresa Stanek Rea, acting director of the USPTO, said the Office concurred with the recommendation.

She said the Office agreed “it would be appropriate to consider making better use of information [relating to patent cases] by examining trends in patent infringement litigation”. It also agreed that it would be appropriate to consider linking trends in patent litigation to internal data on patent examination.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Gift this article