Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Seiko scores big in UDRP case

Japanese watchmaker Seiko has won a UDRP case concerning 138 domain names registered by 106 respondents

In a decision dated August 6, panellist Alistair Payne found that all of the domain names were registered and used in bad faith.

Nearly all of the domains, which were registered under .com and .info, comprised the word Seiko followed by a dictionary word.

Examples were,, and The domains were registered between July 27 2012 and January 12 2013.

Payne noted that despite the 106 different owners, there was evidence of common control over the domain names and/or the websites to which they resolved, including obviously fake physical addresses, the same registration dates, resolving to the same or similar websites, the same hosting service, the use of only two registrars and the close similarity between each domain.

He concluded that “on the balance of probabilities it is most likely that the disputed domain names are controlled by the same person or entity” and that therefore the cases could be consolidated into a single proceeding.

Seiko claimed the domains were all resolving to sites selling goods, including fake Seiko watches – though it was not able to provide evidence of counterfeits bought from the sites.

“The Panel notes that the type of wholesale cyber-squatting in relation to a well-known mark as demonstrated in this case is exactly the sort of conduct that is intended to be deterred by the Policy,” wrote Payne.

Seiko was represented by Sanderson & Co in the UK. The respondents did not reply and were not represented.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Significant changes to the standard of law are unlikely, say sources, who note that some justices seemed sceptical that the parties disagreed on the legal standard
Sources say the High Court of Australia’s ruling that reputation is immaterial in trademark infringement cases could stop famous brands from muscling out smaller players
Members from both sides of the US House of Representatives wrote to USPTO director Kathi Vidal on Friday, March 24, expressing their concern about “patent thicketing.”
Charles Hoskin of Singaporean e-commerce platform Shopee, who made the jump from a luxury brand, says honest conversations and collaborations are key to combatting counterfeiting
Adam Williams speaks to Managing IP about the legacy of Brexit and why IP has sometimes got ‘lost in the noise’ at Westminster
Lawyers wish the latest manual had more details on Federal Circuit cases and that training materials for design patent examiners were online
Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP