Music publishers file copyright infringement claim against Fullscreen

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Music publishers file copyright infringement claim against Fullscreen

A group of music publishers is suing Fullscreen, a company which supplies videos to YouTube, for allegedly infringing copyright on popular songs, particularly with cover versions.

A group of music publishers is suing Fullscreen, a company which supplies videos to YouTube, for allegedly infringing copyright on popular songs.

The complaint, filed by the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) in the Disctrict Court for the Southern District of New York on Tuesday, claims Fullscreen misrepresented itself to YouTube as being licensed and paying royalties to music publishers. It claims that the company reproduced copyrighted works without authorisation, particularly through cover versions.

According to the complaint, Fullscreen is valued at $110 million and is one of the largest multi-channel networks, the Internet equivalent of a broadcast television network. It produces videos that it disseminates over platforms such as YouTube and generates revenue from advertising.

The publishers filing the claim include Warner/Chappell, which was recently sued over the validity of its copyright claims to the song Happy Birthday to You. They are suing for direct copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, inducement of copyright infringement and vicarious copyright infringement and are seeking unspecified damages and an injunction against Fullscreen.

In a statement, NMPA president and CEO David Israelite described copyright infringement as “endemic” to the multi-channel network industry. “We must stop the trend of ignoring the law, profiting from someone else’s work, then asking forgiveness when caught,” he said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article