Music publishers file copyright infringement claim against Fullscreen

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Music publishers file copyright infringement claim against Fullscreen

A group of music publishers is suing Fullscreen, a company which supplies videos to YouTube, for allegedly infringing copyright on popular songs, particularly with cover versions.

A group of music publishers is suing Fullscreen, a company which supplies videos to YouTube, for allegedly infringing copyright on popular songs.

The complaint, filed by the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) in the Disctrict Court for the Southern District of New York on Tuesday, claims Fullscreen misrepresented itself to YouTube as being licensed and paying royalties to music publishers. It claims that the company reproduced copyrighted works without authorisation, particularly through cover versions.

According to the complaint, Fullscreen is valued at $110 million and is one of the largest multi-channel networks, the Internet equivalent of a broadcast television network. It produces videos that it disseminates over platforms such as YouTube and generates revenue from advertising.

The publishers filing the claim include Warner/Chappell, which was recently sued over the validity of its copyright claims to the song Happy Birthday to You. They are suing for direct copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, inducement of copyright infringement and vicarious copyright infringement and are seeking unspecified damages and an injunction against Fullscreen.

In a statement, NMPA president and CEO David Israelite described copyright infringement as “endemic” to the multi-channel network industry. “We must stop the trend of ignoring the law, profiting from someone else’s work, then asking forgiveness when caught,” he said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article