Music publishers file copyright infringement claim against Fullscreen

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Music publishers file copyright infringement claim against Fullscreen

A group of music publishers is suing Fullscreen, a company which supplies videos to YouTube, for allegedly infringing copyright on popular songs, particularly with cover versions.

A group of music publishers is suing Fullscreen, a company which supplies videos to YouTube, for allegedly infringing copyright on popular songs.

The complaint, filed by the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA) in the Disctrict Court for the Southern District of New York on Tuesday, claims Fullscreen misrepresented itself to YouTube as being licensed and paying royalties to music publishers. It claims that the company reproduced copyrighted works without authorisation, particularly through cover versions.

According to the complaint, Fullscreen is valued at $110 million and is one of the largest multi-channel networks, the Internet equivalent of a broadcast television network. It produces videos that it disseminates over platforms such as YouTube and generates revenue from advertising.

The publishers filing the claim include Warner/Chappell, which was recently sued over the validity of its copyright claims to the song Happy Birthday to You. They are suing for direct copyright infringement, contributory copyright infringement, inducement of copyright infringement and vicarious copyright infringement and are seeking unspecified damages and an injunction against Fullscreen.

In a statement, NMPA president and CEO David Israelite described copyright infringement as “endemic” to the multi-channel network industry. “We must stop the trend of ignoring the law, profiting from someone else’s work, then asking forgiveness when caught,” he said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
Gift this article