Google expands pledge not to assert certain patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Google expands pledge not to assert certain patents

Google has renewed its promise that it will not be the first to sue over some software patents and has expanded the number of patents covered under its pledge

The search engine announced its Open Patent Non-Assertion (OPN) Pledge in March. At the time, Google offered 10 of its own patents related to MapReduce, a programming model for processing large data sets which is central to the open source Hadoop framework. The search engine is also encouraging other patent owners to take the pledge.

This week, Google expanded the patents it is offering under the programme to include 79 patents covering data centre management.

Google said the pledge is an effort to reduce patent threats to open-source software (OSS). “It is a response to recent developments in the patent marketplace, whereby companies that increasingly seek the benefits of OSS in their own businesses nonetheless launch attacks against open source products and platforms as it suits their fancy,” the company said in a statement.

Under the programme, patent owners decide which patents they wish to pledge and promise they will only terminate the pledge defensively in response to incoming patent attacks. The promise lasts for the life of the patents, even if they are sold or transferred to another owner.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Gift this article