Google expands pledge not to assert certain patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Google expands pledge not to assert certain patents

Google has renewed its promise that it will not be the first to sue over some software patents and has expanded the number of patents covered under its pledge

The search engine announced its Open Patent Non-Assertion (OPN) Pledge in March. At the time, Google offered 10 of its own patents related to MapReduce, a programming model for processing large data sets which is central to the open source Hadoop framework. The search engine is also encouraging other patent owners to take the pledge.

This week, Google expanded the patents it is offering under the programme to include 79 patents covering data centre management.

Google said the pledge is an effort to reduce patent threats to open-source software (OSS). “It is a response to recent developments in the patent marketplace, whereby companies that increasingly seek the benefits of OSS in their own businesses nonetheless launch attacks against open source products and platforms as it suits their fancy,” the company said in a statement.

Under the programme, patent owners decide which patents they wish to pledge and promise they will only terminate the pledge defensively in response to incoming patent attacks. The promise lasts for the life of the patents, even if they are sold or transferred to another owner.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Gift this article