ITC bans Samsung phones for infringing Apple patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ITC bans Samsung phones for infringing Apple patents

A US trade panel has banned the import of certain Samsung phones for infringing patents owned by rival tech giant Apple

Today’s decision by the International Trade Commission (ITC) banned the import of some older Samsung devices including the Galaxy S 4G, Fascinate, Captivate, Galaxy Tab, and Galaxy Tab 10.1.

The ITC upheld Apple’s claims on two patents relating to headphone jacks and scrolling behaviour, but overturned an earlier ruling that Samsung infringed four other patents belonging to Apple. Many of Samsung’s newer phones work around the patents at issue.

The ITC is expected to release more details about its decision later today.

Earlier this week, the Obama administration vetoed a previous ITC decision which banned certain Apple products that infringed a Samsung patent. This latest ban may also theoretically be vetoed during the next 60 days by the Obama administration, although those products involved standards essential patents. Prior to this week’s intervention, the last presidential veto of a product ban was in 1987.

The ban is the latest development in the long-running Smartphone wars between the two companies.





more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article