Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Obama administration vetoes ITC ban against Apple

President Obama’s administration has vetoed a US trade commission’s ban on the sale and import of certain Apple products that infringed a Samsung patent

The veto overrides an International Trade Commission (ITC) decision on case 337-794 in June, which banned the sale and import of AT&T models of the iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, iPad 3G and iPad 2 3G. The order was based on the ITC’s finding that Apple infringed Samsung’s patent claims covering 3G wireless technology. Samsung had also argued that Apple had infringed another three patents, but the ITC disagreed.

The veto was announced on Sunday by US Trade Representative Michael Froman, who said he had made the decision partially because of the “effect on competitive conditions in the US economy and the effect on US consumers.” The last presidential veto of a product ban was in 1987.

The patent at issue is classified as standards essential, meaning it must be licensed under fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The veto is likely to affect other standards essential patents.

Samsung will still be able to pursue a patent infringement claim against Apple through the courts.

Samsung said in a statement that it is "disappointed" that the ban has been overturned. "The ITC's decision correctly recognized that Samsung has been negotiating in good faith and that Apple remains unwilling to take a license," it said.

Apple said in a statement: “We applaud the Administration for standing up for innovation in this landmark case. Samsung was wrong to abuse the patent system in this way.”

The news is the latest installment in a long-running battle between the two companies over Smartphone technology.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The IPO must change its approach and communicate with IP owners about its attempts at clearing up the trademark register
Counsel are looking at enforceability, business needs and cost savings when filing for patents overseas
James Perkins, member at Cole Schotz in Texas, reveals how smaller tech companies can protect themselves when dealing with larger players
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The EUIPO management board must provide the Council of the EU with a performance assessment before it can remove the executive director
The European Commission confirmed that plans for a unitary SPC will be published in April alongside reforms to the SEP system
The court held that SEP implementers could be injuncted or directed to pay royalties before trial if they are deemed to be unwilling licensees
Patentees should feel cautious optimism over the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G2/21, say European patent attorneys
Significant changes to the standard of law are unlikely, say sources, who note that some justices seemed sceptical that the parties disagreed on the legal standard
Sources say the High Court of Australia’s ruling that reputation is immaterial in trademark infringement cases could stop famous brands from muscling out smaller players