China revokes Gilead’s patent for key HIV drug

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China revokes Gilead’s patent for key HIV drug

SIPO’s Patent Reexamination Board has revoked Gilead’s patent for Viread following an opposition from domestic manufacturer Arisco

The Patent Reexamination Board found that Gilead’s application lacked novelty. Viread (tenofovir) was discovered in 1985 and is considered a front line drug for AIDS treatment.

China for many years has had provisions in its laws allowing for compulsory licences, though none have been issued. Last May, China issued its Measures for Compulsory Licensing of Patent Implementation, which brought about concerns that China would follow India’s lead in aggressively issuing such licences.

Though China has not yet handed out a compulsory licence, many believe that the government uses the provision to increase leverage in negotiations with drug companies. Last year, reports indicated that Gilead was concerned that Viread would be targeted and offered to make donations of the drug to head off the attempt.

A number of other jurisdictions have also taken steps to increase access to the drug. India and Brazil have rejected patents for tenofovir, while Indonesia took a compulsory licence for the drug. Gilead also licenses the patent to the Medicines Patent Pool in order to help increase access to the drug in certain developing economies.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article