Del Monte succeeds in new gTLD challenge

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Del Monte succeeds in new gTLD challenge

American food producer Del Monte has become the first party to win a legal rights objection (LRO) to a new gTLD

In a split decision published this week, a WIPO panel found that there was “something untoward” about an application for the gTLD .delmonte filed by Del Monte International, based in Monte Carlo.

Del Monte

The objector, Del Monte Corporation, owns trade marks for Del Monte in 177 jurisdictions, with use going back to 1891.

Respondent Del Monte International owns trade mark registrations for Del Monte in South Africa, which date to 1966. It has also signed three licence agreements with Del Monte Corporation regarding use of the trade mark on certain products and in certain geographical areas.

Del Monte International had applied for the .delmonte string without notifying Del Monte Corporation or any of its other licensees.

No other parties applied for the string in this round.

The panel considered eight factors in its decision, regarding the registration and use of the mark, and any rights owned by the respondent.

Two of the three-person panel, Sebastian Hughes and William Towns, agreed that the gTLD applied for “creates an impermissible likelihood of confusion between the gTLD and the Objector’s mark”.

But panellist Robert Badgley dissented, saying it was “a close case” and a few points tipped the balance in favour of the respondent: “Respondent has a bona fide basis for owning this gTLD, even if Objector would also have a had a bona fide basis if it had been the applicant for this gTLD.”

Badgley also said he had favoured the acceptance of supplemental submissions from the parties, something which the majority refused. In particular, the South African trade mark certificates were not available to the panel.

The LRO procedure enables rights owners to challenge new gTLD applications that they believe take unfair advantage of, impair the distinctive character of, or otherwise create an impermissible likelihood of confusion with their mark.

Nearly 80 LROs have been filed. So far, 30 have been decided and Del Monte is the first one in which the objection has been upheld. Four cases have been terminated.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Yossi Sivan explains how Israeli judgment is a pro-brand owner departure from the norm and why it sends a strong message that corporate structures are not always a shield
Halim Shehadeh, group CEO of IP firm CWB, says that in the rush to discuss what AI can do, IP firms are overlooking the more important question of whether they are ready
Caitlin Heard, who formally joined the firm from CMS last month, says she is excited by the ‘energy’ of the London office
Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
Gift this article