Del Monte succeeds in new gTLD challenge

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Del Monte succeeds in new gTLD challenge

American food producer Del Monte has become the first party to win a legal rights objection (LRO) to a new gTLD

In a split decision published this week, a WIPO panel found that there was “something untoward” about an application for the gTLD .delmonte filed by Del Monte International, based in Monte Carlo.

Del Monte

The objector, Del Monte Corporation, owns trade marks for Del Monte in 177 jurisdictions, with use going back to 1891.

Respondent Del Monte International owns trade mark registrations for Del Monte in South Africa, which date to 1966. It has also signed three licence agreements with Del Monte Corporation regarding use of the trade mark on certain products and in certain geographical areas.

Del Monte International had applied for the .delmonte string without notifying Del Monte Corporation or any of its other licensees.

No other parties applied for the string in this round.

The panel considered eight factors in its decision, regarding the registration and use of the mark, and any rights owned by the respondent.

Two of the three-person panel, Sebastian Hughes and William Towns, agreed that the gTLD applied for “creates an impermissible likelihood of confusion between the gTLD and the Objector’s mark”.

But panellist Robert Badgley dissented, saying it was “a close case” and a few points tipped the balance in favour of the respondent: “Respondent has a bona fide basis for owning this gTLD, even if Objector would also have a had a bona fide basis if it had been the applicant for this gTLD.”

Badgley also said he had favoured the acceptance of supplemental submissions from the parties, something which the majority refused. In particular, the South African trade mark certificates were not available to the panel.

The LRO procedure enables rights owners to challenge new gTLD applications that they believe take unfair advantage of, impair the distinctive character of, or otherwise create an impermissible likelihood of confusion with their mark.

Nearly 80 LROs have been filed. So far, 30 have been decided and Del Monte is the first one in which the objection has been upheld. Four cases have been terminated.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Yonatan Drori, attorney at Drori-Stav IP in Israel, explains why foreign counsel must treat Israel’s patent disclosure requirements as an ongoing obligation, rather than a one-off formality
From Japan to Southeast Asia, domestic and regional firms picked up some of the biggest prizes, while key foreign players maintained momentum
Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
Gift this article