We need to fix software patents, says outgoing Kappos
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

We need to fix software patents, says outgoing Kappos

In one of his final interviews before leaving office as USPTO Director, David Kappos identified “software and software patenting” as the biggest challenge for his successor.

Speaking to Managing IP before he leaves the USPTO this Friday, Kappos said: “There’s been a lot of controversy over the smartphone patent wars and section 101 on the software side and all of that is important, but there’s also an operational aspect to it.”

David Kappos

David Kappos

He added: “We already have several initiatives underway, including roundtables on the east and west coasts, but that’s going to need to continue. We’re not done until the software industry says we got it right.”

Looking back on his four-year term, Kappos declined to single out anything in particular he is proudest of: “There’s not any one thing, but the giant slate of things we have undertaken and the dizzying array of things we’ve done. When you line up all the projects next to one another, it’s pretty overwhelming.”

He also provided two bits of advice to his (as yet unnamed) successor: listen to your stakeholders and use their guidance and partner with your workforce, especially labour unions.

The full exclusive interviewis only available on managingip.com (subscription or free trial required).

Kappos’s comments come as the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit prepares to rehear en banc the controversial business method patents case CLS v Alice next week.

The Court has overturned its split decision in July last year to uphold Alice’s patent claims for a computerised trading system which minimises risk.

In 2010 the US Supreme Court said the Federal Circuit’s machine-or-transformation test should not be “the sole test” for patent eligibility.

Meanwhile, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board has decided its first case under the new Covered Business Method review procedure, SAP v Versata.

The implications of the CLS v Alice hearing and the SAP v Versata decision are discussed further in Federal Circuit and USPTO seek to clarify business method patents(subscription or free trial required).

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
The winner of Managing IP’s Life Achievement Award discusses 50 years in IP law and how even he can’t avoid imposter syndrome
Saya Choudhary of Singh & Singh explains how her team navigated nine years of litigation to secure record damages of $29 million and the lessons learned along the way
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
A team of IP and media law specialists has joined from SKW Schwarz alongside a former counsel at Sky
The Irish government has delayed a planned referendum on whether Ireland should join the Unified Patent Court, prompting concern about when a vote may take place
With more than 250 winners recognised during the ceremony, there are many reasons to be positive about the health of the IP industry in EMEA
Gift this article