We need to fix software patents, says outgoing Kappos
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

We need to fix software patents, says outgoing Kappos

In one of his final interviews before leaving office as USPTO Director, David Kappos identified “software and software patenting” as the biggest challenge for his successor.

Speaking to Managing IP before he leaves the USPTO this Friday, Kappos said: “There’s been a lot of controversy over the smartphone patent wars and section 101 on the software side and all of that is important, but there’s also an operational aspect to it.”

David Kappos

David Kappos

He added: “We already have several initiatives underway, including roundtables on the east and west coasts, but that’s going to need to continue. We’re not done until the software industry says we got it right.”

Looking back on his four-year term, Kappos declined to single out anything in particular he is proudest of: “There’s not any one thing, but the giant slate of things we have undertaken and the dizzying array of things we’ve done. When you line up all the projects next to one another, it’s pretty overwhelming.”

He also provided two bits of advice to his (as yet unnamed) successor: listen to your stakeholders and use their guidance and partner with your workforce, especially labour unions.

The full exclusive interviewis only available on managingip.com (subscription or free trial required).

Kappos’s comments come as the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit prepares to rehear en banc the controversial business method patents case CLS v Alice next week.

The Court has overturned its split decision in July last year to uphold Alice’s patent claims for a computerised trading system which minimises risk.

In 2010 the US Supreme Court said the Federal Circuit’s machine-or-transformation test should not be “the sole test” for patent eligibility.

Meanwhile, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board has decided its first case under the new Covered Business Method review procedure, SAP v Versata.

The implications of the CLS v Alice hearing and the SAP v Versata decision are discussed further in Federal Circuit and USPTO seek to clarify business method patents(subscription or free trial required).

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Firms explain how monitoring, referrals and relationships with foreign firms helped them get more work at the TTAB
Luke Toft explains why he moved back to Fox Rothschild after working in-house at Sleep Number for five months
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
In a seminal ruling, the Beijing Internet Court said images generated by Stable Diffusion counted as original works
Boston-based John Lanza is hoping to work more with life sciences colleagues on the ‘exciting’ application of AI to drug discovery
The Delhi High Court has expressed its willingness to set global licensing terms in the Nokia-Oppo dispute, but it must deal with longstanding problems first
Some patent counsel are still encountering errors even though the USPTO has fully transitioned to the new system
A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career