ITC launches pilot programme aimed at curbing patent trolls
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ITC launches pilot programme aimed at curbing patent trolls

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) announced on Monday that it has launched a pilot programme to speed up the disposal of patent cases in an effort to thwart so-called trolls

The programme will test whether earlier rulings on certain issues in Section 337 investigations, which deal with allegedly unfair import practices usually in relation to intellectual property, could reduce frivolous litigation.

The main remedy available in Section 337 investigations is an order requiring US Customs to preventing the infringing imports from entering the country.

Under the scheme, an administrative judge will determine whether companies suing for patent infringement have sufficient production, research or licensing operations in the US to make them eligible to be heard at the ITC. In some cases, the judges may be able to determine whether the plaintiff meets the criteria within 100 days.

The ITC may adjust the programme once it is underway. If the trial is successful, the system may be implemented permanently.

In a press release, the ITC admitted that “resolving issues in pilot program investigations will be challenging” but argued that “the complainant controls the timing of the complaint’s filing and should be prepared to prove its case, including such elements as domestic industry, importation, and standing, without extensive discovery on these issues".

The ITC initiative appears to be part of a coordinated effort by government agencies to address the growing issue of patent trolls. Earlier this month the White House issued a proposal to combat trolls, which will largely be put into action by the USPTO, and the Federal Trade Commission announced it will investigate their potentially anti-competitive practices.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers weigh in on the USPTO’s request for comment on the effects of AI on prior art analysis and obviousness determinations
A vast majority of corporates – especially smaller businesses – rely on a trusted referral when instructing external counsel, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Technological innovation should play a critical role in advancing sustainable practices, argues Justin Delfino, global head of IP and R&D at Evalueserve
Ewan Grist of Bird & Bird, who acted for Lidl in its trademark victory against Tesco, reveals some of the lessons brand owners can take from the judgment
Dolby’s lawsuit at the Delhi High Court follows a record win by Ericsson earlier this year against the same defendant
Tee Tan, chief information officer at the owner of several IP firms, says to avoid tech just for the sake of it and explains how his company builds in-house tools
Regardless of whether the FTC’s ban on non-competes goes into effect, businesses should stop relying on these agreements
Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
Gift this article