ITC launches pilot programme aimed at curbing patent trolls

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ITC launches pilot programme aimed at curbing patent trolls

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) announced on Monday that it has launched a pilot programme to speed up the disposal of patent cases in an effort to thwart so-called trolls

The programme will test whether earlier rulings on certain issues in Section 337 investigations, which deal with allegedly unfair import practices usually in relation to intellectual property, could reduce frivolous litigation.

The main remedy available in Section 337 investigations is an order requiring US Customs to preventing the infringing imports from entering the country.

Under the scheme, an administrative judge will determine whether companies suing for patent infringement have sufficient production, research or licensing operations in the US to make them eligible to be heard at the ITC. In some cases, the judges may be able to determine whether the plaintiff meets the criteria within 100 days.

The ITC may adjust the programme once it is underway. If the trial is successful, the system may be implemented permanently.

In a press release, the ITC admitted that “resolving issues in pilot program investigations will be challenging” but argued that “the complainant controls the timing of the complaint’s filing and should be prepared to prove its case, including such elements as domestic industry, importation, and standing, without extensive discovery on these issues".

The ITC initiative appears to be part of a coordinated effort by government agencies to address the growing issue of patent trolls. Earlier this month the White House issued a proposal to combat trolls, which will largely be put into action by the USPTO, and the Federal Trade Commission announced it will investigate their potentially anti-competitive practices.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel at five US firms explain how they get less experienced attorneys ready for conducting oral arguments
Tesla and Avanci’s FRAND battle, a boost for UK artists concerning royalty payments and lawyer moves involving White & Case and Fieldfisher were among the top talking points
Finnegan partners outline how the firm determines whether AI tools are safe to use and if they are a worthwhile investment
Bill Braunlin was drawn to the firm because of its work with start-ups and universities, as well as its employees’ industry experience
Melissa Anyetei discusses how she’s building her practice and reveals the challenges of working at a larger firm
Lawyers at Aksoy IP discuss why a delay in implementing a new procedure for cancelling trademarks in Türkiye is causing a headache for practitioners
Private equity firms explain how external funding and expertise can help IP firms and reveal what they look for before investing
Our latest UPC update covers first-instance decisions, upcoming hearings, and other significant developments
Managing IP goes behind the scenes to uncover what happens when setting up an SEP licensing programme for electric vehicle chargers, and discovers why law firms play a crucial role
Exclusive data and in-house analysis show that law firms are able to respond quickly when engaging with in-house clients but struggle to make the grade when it comes to the quality of their answers
Gift this article