ITC launches pilot programme aimed at curbing patent trolls

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

ITC launches pilot programme aimed at curbing patent trolls

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) announced on Monday that it has launched a pilot programme to speed up the disposal of patent cases in an effort to thwart so-called trolls

The programme will test whether earlier rulings on certain issues in Section 337 investigations, which deal with allegedly unfair import practices usually in relation to intellectual property, could reduce frivolous litigation.

The main remedy available in Section 337 investigations is an order requiring US Customs to preventing the infringing imports from entering the country.

Under the scheme, an administrative judge will determine whether companies suing for patent infringement have sufficient production, research or licensing operations in the US to make them eligible to be heard at the ITC. In some cases, the judges may be able to determine whether the plaintiff meets the criteria within 100 days.

The ITC may adjust the programme once it is underway. If the trial is successful, the system may be implemented permanently.

In a press release, the ITC admitted that “resolving issues in pilot program investigations will be challenging” but argued that “the complainant controls the timing of the complaint’s filing and should be prepared to prove its case, including such elements as domestic industry, importation, and standing, without extensive discovery on these issues".

The ITC initiative appears to be part of a coordinated effort by government agencies to address the growing issue of patent trolls. Earlier this month the White House issued a proposal to combat trolls, which will largely be put into action by the USPTO, and the Federal Trade Commission announced it will investigate their potentially anti-competitive practices.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
Gift this article