US patent licensing firm says it received China arrest threats

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US patent licensing firm says it received China arrest threats

The long-running legal battle between InterDigital and Huawei took a new twist this week after InterDigital claimed its representatives were threatened with arrest by China’s antitrust authorities.

InterDigital, a California-headquartered company that licenses its portfolio of wireless-related technologies to telecoms companies, says it was told that China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) “couldn’t guarantee the safety of” its executives if they attended a meeting scheduled for yesterday.

This latest move by the NDRC comes after a series of patent battles between InterDigital, which is valued at about $1.3 billion, and Huawei, China’s leading telecoms equipment company.

InterDigital revealed in a securities filing on October 31 that it is being investigated for alleged antitrust violations by the NDRC.

A spokesman for the company told Managing IP that on December 10, the NDRC requested a meeting with its chief executive officer William Merritt in Beijing on December 18.

The spokesman said InterDigital told the NDRC that Merritt could not travel to Beijing at such short notice and that the company would send other executives in his place.

He said the NDRC then informed InterDigital through its Chinese counsel that its executives might be arrested or detained.

“To this date, we have cooperated fully with the NDRC’s investigation of our company, and continue to believe that we have done absolutely nothing wrong,” the company said in a statement. “However, we are simply unable to comply with any investigation that is accompanied by a threat to the safety of our executives.”

According to Reuters, InterDigital chief executive officer Merritt said in a letter to Chinese officials that the NDIC had told InterDigital it is being investigated because it filed a complaint about Chinese companies infringing on its patents with the US International Trade Commission (ITC).

InterDigital has asked the ITC to block imports of Huawei’s products into the US, and Huawei has complained to the European Commission about InterDigital’s patent licensing strategies.

InterDigital and Huawei have also squared up before the Chinese courts. In October, Guangdong High Court affirmed a trial court's ruling that InterDigital abused its market position, after Huawei accused it of breaching China’s Anti-Monopoly Law when it attempted to license standards-essential patents involving 2G and 3G data transmission.

The court ordered a damages award of Rmb20 million ($3.3 million) and set a royalty rate for the patents – a rare example of courts taking an active role in FRAND cases. The decision is included in Managing IP’s list of the 40 most important cases of 2013.

China’s NDRC appears to be taking a tougher approach against companies it suspects of violating the country’s antitrust rules. Last month it began an investigation into the activities of semiconductor company Qualcomm. The California-based company said it is not aware of any charge by the NDRC that Qualcomm has violated the Anti-Monopoly Law.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article