Gurry to stand again as WIPO DG

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Gurry to stand again as WIPO DG

Francis Gurry intends to stand for a second term as WIPO Director General, Managing IP has learned

The Australian, who was elected in 2008 for a six-year term, confirmed today that he will allow his name to be put forward again.

His current term expires on September 30 2014. He is the fourth WIPO Director General, and has worked at the Organisation since 1985.

According to a circular sent last Friday, each WIPO member state has until December 6 this year to put forward one national as a candidate.

It is not yet clear if there will be other contenders for the position or, if so, who they will be.

The Coordination Committee will meet on March 6 and 7 next year to nominate a candidate for appointment. The successful candidate will be formally appointed at sessions of the General Assembly and the Assemblies of the Paris and Berne Unions on May 8 and 9, and will take up the post from October 1 2014.

The principles for nominating a director general state that the nomination should “if possible, be made by consensus”. But they also acknowledge that “voting will probably be a necessary means of building consensus for the nomination of a candidate” and set out how votes should proceed.

The Director General is normally appointed for a six-year term.

Gurry will be interviewed as part of Managing IP’s special supplement marking 40 years of the European Patent Convention, which will be online at the end of September.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article