Australian IP statistics - influenced by China's National IP Strategy?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Australian IP statistics - influenced by China's National IP Strategy?

Data published by IP Australia shows increasing activity from China and the Asia-Pacific region

Australia received 1,856 innovation patent applications in 2012, a 9% increase over 2011. Filings from China alone accounted for more than half of the increase.

By contrast, there were 26,358 invention patent applications in 2012, only a 3% increase over the previous year.

Invention patent filings from China also increased, though they account for just a small portion of total volume. Chinese patentees filed 510 invention patents in Australia last year, a 34% increase. South Korea, well known for its high tech industries, saw a 48% increase with 502 filings. In comparison, filings from European countries including Germany, France and the UK dropped, though overall volume is still considerably higher than either China or Korea. Germany for example, despite seeing a 6% decrease, still had 1,596 applications, enough for third most among foreign countries behind the US (11,378), and Japan (1,746).

The report is silent on the cause behind the increase in Chinese filings. Some critics of China’s IP policies have suggested that monetary incentives for domestic and international filings encourage low quality patents. Utility models, which are similar to innovation patents, drew particular attention. One lawyer explained that China’s incentives for PCT filings turn on filing rather than actually getting a patent, so some companies will file a PCT application, only to abandon it before reaching the national phase.

IP Australia’s data also shows that Australian companies are active overseas. Data for 2011 shows that Australian companies file 58% more patents in international markets when compared to domestic filings.

China’s importance as a growing market is reflected here. In 2012, it became the most popular location for Australian trade mark filings abroad with 2,571 applications. After China, Australian companies filed the most trade marks in New Zealand (2,215) and the US (2,015).

The Australia Intellectual Property Report 2013 can be found here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, ELTEMATE
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
François Pochart, Grégoire Desrousseaux and Lionel Martin, long-standing figures in the firm’s patent litigation team, are set to help launch a Paris-based litigation offering
The Unitary Patent has passed 100,000 registrations, but new data raises the question of whether 30% uptake is a ceiling or a staging post for further growth, say Michael Nielsen and Darren Smyth of EIP and Andrew Samm at Patently
The new generation of in-house IP leaders want commercial judgment, accessibility and flexibility, with AI raising expectations around both fees and delivery
Gift this article