Europe plans to tackle goods-in-transit problem
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Europe plans to tackle goods-in-transit problem

Proposals to reform EU trade mark law were finally published last week – and included a nice surprise for trade mark owners

EU

The proposals include substantial changes to the Trade Marks Directive, CTM Regulation and Fees Regulation.

Draft versions of the plans were circulated widely earlier this year and reported on managingip.com in February.

Among other changes, the European Commission plans to cut fees for CTM applications covering only one class rather than three and improve harmonisation by requiring national offices to provide administrative cancellation and opposition systems.

The February draft also included proposals to change the burden of proof in goods-in-transit cases, so that the shipper would be required to show that the goods were not intended for the EU market. This was designed to address concerns raised by brand owners following the CJEU decision in the Philips and Nokia cases.

However, the final proposal published last week goes much further than this. Noting that “there is an urgent need to have in place a European legal framework enabling a more effective fight against the counterfeiting of goods” it proposes entitling right holders to prevent third parties from bring goods into the EU if they bear a trade mark “which is essentially identical to the trade mark registered in respect of those goods”.

The new right would apply “regardless of whether [the goods] are released for free circulation”.

Stuart Adams of Rouse in London, who sits on an INTA committee which has been addressing this issue, said the proposal would be welcomed by brand owners: “I can’t say how happy I am.”

He added: “If ratified, these proposals will be a significant victory for rights holders and a blow against counterfeiters.”

The Directive and Regulation proposals are now subject to the codecision procedure, requiring approval by the European Parliament and Council. This is expected next year. Once approved, the changes in the Directive will have to be transposed into national laws within two years. The changes to the Fees Regulation follow a slightly different procedure.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Managing IP’s Max Walters appeared on the latest episode of ‘Two IPs in a pod’, a regular podcast hosted by the UK patent attorney body, to discuss AI, awards and more
Sources at law firms say they have spent more than three years waiting for IP regulations and explain how the delay is affecting their business
Gift this article