Dualit wins UK dispute Nespresso-compatible coffee capsules

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Dualit wins UK dispute Nespresso-compatible coffee capsules

The High Court in London has ruled that Dualit, a UK company that makes coffee machines and capsules, is able to sell Dualit NX capsules that are compatible with Nestle’s Nespresso machines

Nestec, which owns the Nespresso brand, accused Dualit of infringing its EP (UK) 2 103 236 patent by supplying coffee capsules that consumers can use in the Swiss company’s Nespresso machines. Dualit denied infringing the patent, which it said was invalid on the grounds of prior use by Nestec.

On Monday Mr Justice Arnold ruled that the patent was invalid and that, even if it was valid, Dualit had not infringed it.

Coffee capsule patent

Leslie Gort-Barten, managing director of Dualit and a defendant in the case, welcomed the ruling, describing it as victory for consumers and a “win-win” for retailers: “Not only will it grow retailers’ profits since they have greater access to the lucrative replacement capsule sector but we see it will boost the overall popularity and sales of coffee machines – the UK coffee culture is currently worth £4 billion annually,” he said.

Arnold criticised the parties for litigating a range of issues, rather than “concentration upon the essentials”. He also rejected Nestec’s arguments that the facts that its machines were fitted with “tamper proof” screws showed that the machines were not intended to be disassembled.

“In my judgment it makes no difference that the screws were ‘tamper proof’”, said Arnold. “The screws were only ‘tamper proof’ in the sense that slightly more specialised, but nevertheless widely available, equipment was required to undo them than ordinary screws. It follows that a skilled person in the position of the consumers could readily disassemble one of the machines. In the absence of any obligation of confidentiality, he would have been free in law and equity to disassemble the machine and to use the information gained thereby. Thus the information was made available to the public.”

Litigation over IP rights for coffee machines and capsules is being conducted between various companies in disputes in many European countries.

Simon Thorley QC and Benet Brandreth, instructed by Bird & Bird, advised Nestec, Nestlé Nespresso and Nespresso UK. Mark Vanhegan QC and Anna Edwards-Stuart (instructed by Jensen & Son) advised Dualit. 

In a statement, Daniel Weston, general counsel for Nestlé Nespresso, said the company was disappointed with the ruling and considering its options: “We believe the decision is inconsistent with the ruling by the European Patent Office in April 2012, confirming the validity of a key patent for the Nespresso system."

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article