India accedes to Madrid Protocol

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India accedes to Madrid Protocol

After more than six years of preparation, India will complete its final accession to the Madrid Protocol on July 8

India is the 90th country to accede to the protocol, joining recent signatories Mexico, the Philippines and New Zealand.

The country's cabinet agreed to join Madrid back in February 2007, and India has been working to ensure that its trade mark system was prepared to meet all its obligations under the Protocol.

One major concern was application pendency periods. In an interview with Managing IP in May 2010, then controller of patents and trade marks PH Kurian said that India had reduced pendency times to 18 months, despite claims by some rights holders that applications often took two to three years. Practitioners told Managing IP that in the last two years, the IP office had made it a priority to clear out its backlog and to continue reducing pendency periods in preparation for Madrid.

Some of the newest members of the Protocol have faced challenges. Mexico’s lack of an opposition system is seen as a flaw, and domestic use of the Madrid Protocol has been low there. In the Philippines, the Intellectual Property Association of the Philippines has submitted a constitutional challenge, arguing that the changes in law made to comply with Madrid were improperly enacted, though the lawsuit has not stopped the accession.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Gift this article