India accedes to Madrid Protocol

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India accedes to Madrid Protocol

After more than six years of preparation, India will complete its final accession to the Madrid Protocol on July 8

India is the 90th country to accede to the protocol, joining recent signatories Mexico, the Philippines and New Zealand.

The country's cabinet agreed to join Madrid back in February 2007, and India has been working to ensure that its trade mark system was prepared to meet all its obligations under the Protocol.

One major concern was application pendency periods. In an interview with Managing IP in May 2010, then controller of patents and trade marks PH Kurian said that India had reduced pendency times to 18 months, despite claims by some rights holders that applications often took two to three years. Practitioners told Managing IP that in the last two years, the IP office had made it a priority to clear out its backlog and to continue reducing pendency periods in preparation for Madrid.

Some of the newest members of the Protocol have faced challenges. Mexico’s lack of an opposition system is seen as a flaw, and domestic use of the Madrid Protocol has been low there. In the Philippines, the Intellectual Property Association of the Philippines has submitted a constitutional challenge, arguing that the changes in law made to comply with Madrid were improperly enacted, though the lawsuit has not stopped the accession.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article