Why copyright termination heralds a perfect storm

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why copyright termination heralds a perfect storm

For those AIPLA Annual Meeting attendees who (mis)spent their youth dancing to the Village People’s disco classic YMCA, it might come as something of a shock to realise that the band released the song almost 35 years ago

The song’s age is significant, because section 203 of the U.S. Copyright Act gives authors the right to terminate grants of copyright made after January 1, 1978, as long as they exercised the grant at least 35 years ago.

Kevin C. Parks of Leydig Voit & Mayer spoke at an AIPLA Annual Meeting session on copyright entitled Copyright Openings and Closings-Open Source, the OPEN Act, and Termination Rights. He explained why the law has the makings of a perfect storm—or at least a perfect storm of litigation, using YMCA co-writer Victor Willis as a case study.

Willis (the Village People’s “cop” and lead singer) assigned his rights in a series of Village People songs to a music publishing company soon after writing them. Willis married a lawyer in 2007 (“a good move,” said Parks), and later filed a notice of termination on publisher Scorpio Music. It responded by seeking a declaratory statement that the notice had been improperly filed, claiming that since Willis did not represent a majority of the joint authors of the songs in suit he could not unilaterally terminate the assignment.

But in May, a California court ruled that Willis was entitled to reclaim his copyright in the songs since he had transferred his copyright interest separately from the other authors.

“Although it was a narrow holding, it was definitely round one to the creative community,” said Parks. Now other music is subject to termination notices, with Bob Dylan, Tom Petty and Kris Kristofferson among those seeking the return of their rights.

Yet the ruling may not strip music publishers of their catalogues, said Parks. Not all artists want to manage and exploit their own rights: it’s a complex, time-consuming business that many are happy to leave to specialists. There may also be commercial advantages to leaving all of their copyrights in one place. That means that many artists will choose to negotiate new, more generous terms for their copyright assignments rather than reclaim the rights.

Parks left the audience with his own, updated version of Willis’ song: “Young man,” he said. “It’s fine to (terminate) YMCA.”

Download the AIPLA Daily Report, published by Managing IP from Washington, DC from our conference newspapers page.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The new outfit, Ashurst Perkins Coie, will bring together around 3,000 lawyers across 23 countries
In the seventh episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Out, a network for LGBTQAI+ professionals and their allies
Sara Horton, co-chair of Willkie’s IP litigation group, reflects on launching the firm’s Chicago office during a global pandemic, and how she advises young, female attorneys
Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
Gift this article