Why copyright termination heralds a perfect storm
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why copyright termination heralds a perfect storm

For those AIPLA Annual Meeting attendees who (mis)spent their youth dancing to the Village People’s disco classic YMCA, it might come as something of a shock to realise that the band released the song almost 35 years ago

The song’s age is significant, because section 203 of the U.S. Copyright Act gives authors the right to terminate grants of copyright made after January 1, 1978, as long as they exercised the grant at least 35 years ago.

Kevin C. Parks of Leydig Voit & Mayer spoke at an AIPLA Annual Meeting session on copyright entitled Copyright Openings and Closings-Open Source, the OPEN Act, and Termination Rights. He explained why the law has the makings of a perfect storm—or at least a perfect storm of litigation, using YMCA co-writer Victor Willis as a case study.

Willis (the Village People’s “cop” and lead singer) assigned his rights in a series of Village People songs to a music publishing company soon after writing them. Willis married a lawyer in 2007 (“a good move,” said Parks), and later filed a notice of termination on publisher Scorpio Music. It responded by seeking a declaratory statement that the notice had been improperly filed, claiming that since Willis did not represent a majority of the joint authors of the songs in suit he could not unilaterally terminate the assignment.

But in May, a California court ruled that Willis was entitled to reclaim his copyright in the songs since he had transferred his copyright interest separately from the other authors.

“Although it was a narrow holding, it was definitely round one to the creative community,” said Parks. Now other music is subject to termination notices, with Bob Dylan, Tom Petty and Kris Kristofferson among those seeking the return of their rights.

Yet the ruling may not strip music publishers of their catalogues, said Parks. Not all artists want to manage and exploit their own rights: it’s a complex, time-consuming business that many are happy to leave to specialists. There may also be commercial advantages to leaving all of their copyrights in one place. That means that many artists will choose to negotiate new, more generous terms for their copyright assignments rather than reclaim the rights.

Parks left the audience with his own, updated version of Willis’ song: “Young man,” he said. “It’s fine to (terminate) YMCA.”

Download the AIPLA Daily Report, published by Managing IP from Washington, DC from our conference newspapers page.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Dario Pietrantonio of Robic discusses growth opportunities for the firm and shares insights from his journey to managing director
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
The winner of Managing IP’s Life Achievement Award discusses 50 years in IP law and how even he can’t avoid imposter syndrome
Saya Choudhary of Singh & Singh explains how her team navigated nine years of litigation to secure record damages of $29 million and the lessons learned along the way
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
A team of IP and media law specialists has joined from SKW Schwarz alongside a former counsel at Sky
The Irish government has delayed a planned referendum on whether Ireland should join the Unified Patent Court, prompting concern about when a vote may take place
Gift this article