Don’t use IP law as a hammer

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Don’t use IP law as a hammer

In-house trade mark counsel today discussed how visceral reactions to infringement or negative feedback on social media sites can backfire and quickly destroy brand loyalty

Tamara Reznick of Expedia cited the example of Nestlé’s response to a Greenpeace ad accusing the company of purchasing palm oil from companies that are destroying Indonesian rainforests. The campaign used a modified Kit Kat logo and posted negative tweets to the company’s Twitter site using the logo.

Nestlé immediately deleted the tweets and publicly threatened legal action. “They used IP law as a hammer,” said Reznick. “This angered consumers, who wanted to see the actual issue addressed.”

Customer pressure eventually resulted in Nestlé cutting ties with the palm oil companies.

Reznick said examples like this underscore the importance of in-house discussing appropriate tactics with their marketing departments ahead of time.

Reznick was speaking as part of a panel titled “Social Networking: Friend or Foe to Brand Owners” at the McCarthy Institute-Microsoft Trademark Symposium in New York City today. The Symposium’s theme was “Trademark Law and its Challenges”.

Mei-Lan Stark of Fox Entertainment Group said that “the best defence can be a good offence” when it comes to social media, which means constantly engaging users and refreshing content on a daily basis to create brand awareness and loyalty.

The sentiment that brands should tread carefully when using trade mark law as a solution to infringement online was echoed in a later session about ISP liability.

J Scott Evans of Yahoo! passionately told a panel comprising David Bernstein of Debevoise & Plimpton, Martin Schwimmer of Leason Ellis, Peter Becker of Microsoft and Brad Silver of Time Warner that the trade mark community should think twice before suing intermediaries such as Yahoo!

Yahoo! did not allow users to purchase trade marked keywords until February last year, when Microsoft changed its policy to align with Google. Microsoft’s search engine Bing powers Yahoo! Search. However, it still does not allow use of trade marks in ad text.

“We need to be careful as a community about going after and persecuting the one company who’s done the most for you,” said Evans.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article