Don’t use IP law as a hammer

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Don’t use IP law as a hammer

In-house trade mark counsel today discussed how visceral reactions to infringement or negative feedback on social media sites can backfire and quickly destroy brand loyalty

Tamara Reznick of Expedia cited the example of Nestlé’s response to a Greenpeace ad accusing the company of purchasing palm oil from companies that are destroying Indonesian rainforests. The campaign used a modified Kit Kat logo and posted negative tweets to the company’s Twitter site using the logo.

Nestlé immediately deleted the tweets and publicly threatened legal action. “They used IP law as a hammer,” said Reznick. “This angered consumers, who wanted to see the actual issue addressed.”

Customer pressure eventually resulted in Nestlé cutting ties with the palm oil companies.

Reznick said examples like this underscore the importance of in-house discussing appropriate tactics with their marketing departments ahead of time.

Reznick was speaking as part of a panel titled “Social Networking: Friend or Foe to Brand Owners” at the McCarthy Institute-Microsoft Trademark Symposium in New York City today. The Symposium’s theme was “Trademark Law and its Challenges”.

Mei-Lan Stark of Fox Entertainment Group said that “the best defence can be a good offence” when it comes to social media, which means constantly engaging users and refreshing content on a daily basis to create brand awareness and loyalty.

The sentiment that brands should tread carefully when using trade mark law as a solution to infringement online was echoed in a later session about ISP liability.

J Scott Evans of Yahoo! passionately told a panel comprising David Bernstein of Debevoise & Plimpton, Martin Schwimmer of Leason Ellis, Peter Becker of Microsoft and Brad Silver of Time Warner that the trade mark community should think twice before suing intermediaries such as Yahoo!

Yahoo! did not allow users to purchase trade marked keywords until February last year, when Microsoft changed its policy to align with Google. Microsoft’s search engine Bing powers Yahoo! Search. However, it still does not allow use of trade marks in ad text.

“We need to be careful as a community about going after and persecuting the one company who’s done the most for you,” said Evans.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Geoff Steward and Rebecca Newman of Addleshaw Goddard explain how they secured victory in a rare ‘genericide’ case and why the work went beyond the courtroom
Nancy Frandsen looks back on her career, from answering a paralegal advert to expanding RCCB’s ‘entrepreneurial’ IP practice as a partner
The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Gift this article