IBM still top patent holder – but not for long
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IBM still top patent holder – but not for long

IFI Claims Patent Services’ list of the top 50 global companies awarded the most US utility patents in 2011 ranks IBM on top for the 19th year in a row

However, that position could be in danger according to IFI’s data on published patent applications, which provides a glimpse of the market two or three years down the road.

“For the past two years, Samsung’s applications eclipsed those of IBM,” said an IFI release. “In 2011, we saw more than 5,600 published applications from Samsung versus less than 5,000 for IBM. 2010 also saw a similar result.”

The rankings also do not take into account portfolio ownership. "AT&T, for example, files its patents under multiple assignee names,” said IFI Claims Patent Services CEO Mike Baycroft.

He added: “If we look at its combined portfolio, we would discover more than 1,300 additional new patents in 2011 which would result in a much higher overall ranking. Mergers and acquisitions, divestitures and the direct sale and licensing of patents all contribute to a dynamic IP landscape."

Eight of the top 10 spots and 25 of the top 50 are held by Asian firms, while US firms captured only 17. “Global companies, and especially Asian ones, are collecting US patents at a dizzying pace,” said Baycroft.

Asian countries represented in the top 50 include Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

The survey also revealed that the USPTO issued 224,505 utility patents in 2011, an increase of 2% over 2010. Despite the increase, “there appears to be a slight lessoning of patent growth among individual companies in the top 50,” said IFI. Cisco, HP, Intel, Microsoft and Oracle all saw fewer patent grants than in 2010, and 16 of the top 50 companies produced fewer patents than last year.

In 2010, only one of the top 50 received fewer than the prior year.

Apple was one of 12 “exceptional gainers”, moving up in the rankings to number 39 from number 46 last year.

IFI uses proprietary algorithms and analysis of USPTO data to compile the annual list.

Top 10 US patent recipients - 2011

1

6180

International Business Machines Corp

United States

2

4894

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd KR

Korea

3

2821

Canon K K JP

Japan

4

2559

Panasonic Corp JP

Japan

5

2483

Toshiba Corp JP

Japan

6

2311

Microsoft Corp

United States

7

2286

Sony Corp JP

Japan

8

1533

Seiko Epson Corp JP

Japan

9

1514

Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd TW

Taiwan

10

1465

Hitachi Ltd JP

Japan



more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models
Allen & Gledhill partner Jia Yi Toh shares her experience of representing the winning team in the first-ever case filed under Singapore’s new fast-track IP dispute resolution system
In-house lawyers reveal how they balance cost, quality, and other criteria to get the most from their relationships with external counsel
Dario Pietrantonio of Robic discusses growth opportunities for the firm and shares insights from his journey to managing director
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
Gift this article