Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Google Books library ruling bad news for Author’s Guild

The libraries that supplied the books for Google’s effort to create the world’s largest online library were covered by fair use, a judge has ruled

The Author’s Guild had claimed the libraries that provided millions of works to the search engine to be scanned for the Google Books project without asking writers’ permission were infringing its members’ copyright.

But Judge Harold Baer of the District Court for the Southern District of New York said he could not imagine a definition of fair use that would cause him to terminate “this invaluable contribution to the progress of science and cultivation of the arts”. He also emphasised the public interest in the project’s aim of making books available digitally to visually impaired people.

The Author’s Guild is also suing Google in a separate lawsuit. While this month’s ruling for the libraries in The Author’s Guild v Hathitrust does not guarantee Google will prevail, it bodes well for the search engine.

“Certainly I would think that the judges are watching each other, but they are separate cases and separate defendants,” said Hillel Parness of Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi, who has been following the litigation.

Parness noted that statements made by Judge Denny Chin, who rejected a previous attempt by the Author’s Guild and Google to reach a class action settlement, suggested Chin may have concerns about Google’s “opt-out rather than opt-in” policy.

The ruling comes just one week after the search engine announced it had reached a separate settlement with the Association of American Publishers (AAP) over Google Books, ending a seven-year legal dispute.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Online storytelling platform Humans of Bombay isn’t wrong for trying to protect its copyright, but it could have handled its dispute better
We have started accepting submissions from in-house counsel and teams for the 19th annual Managing IP Awards programme
Patient groups and generics makers may have to bear the brunt of India’s latest attempt at patent reform
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
Paolo Tavolato, who will share the role, said private equity support would help the IP consultancy achieve its ambitious M&A plans
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas has hired former Anand & Anand partner Swati Sharma and hopes to compete with specialist IP firms
Rapporteur-Judge András Kupecz ruled that education and training weren’t legitimate reasons for a member of the public to access documents
Searches for comparison prior art will be a little easier, but practitioners will have to put more thought into claim construction and design patent titles
The Helsinki local division rejected AIM Sport’s request for a preliminary injunction in a dispute with rival Supponor
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP