What IP does Huawei own in the United States?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

What IP does Huawei own in the United States?

While Chinese companies have generally been slow to protect their intellectual property abroad, Huawei bucks the trend. In the light of a Congressional warning that it and ZTE pose a security threat to the United States, Managing IP investigates

A search of the USPTO database reveals that the Shenzhen-based telecoms company or its subsidiaries has applied to register 1,201 invention and design patents (based on a search of applications in which the assignee is Huawei).

These range from design patents for the ornamental design for a mobile phone to patents for a method and device for allocating radio configuration types. The company has been advised by a group of firms including Leydig, Voit & Mayer and Slater & Matsil as well as Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione and Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner.

A search of the US trade marks data base reveals 184 live applications for marks from owners named Huawei. These are Huawei Glare, Huawei Softip and Meditopia. Peter Sloane of Leason Ellis has advised Huawei on the applications.

You can read more about how Chinese companies protect their IP overseas in our latest survey of Chinese in-house counsel in this month’s issue of Managing IP.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article