UK fast-tracks Apple/Samsung design case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

UK fast-tracks Apple/Samsung design case

A judge in the England & Wales High Court has said that a trial between smartphone rivals Apple and Samsung in a designs dispute can be held in June

Yesterday Mr Justice Mann accepted Samsung's request for an expedited hearing in the case, in which it is seeking a declaration of non-infringement against Apple's registered Community designs. It is also seeking an injunction restraining Apple from making threats to sue for infringement.

Samsung argued that a hearing should be expedited to remove uncertainty about whether its products infringe Apple's rights.

Mann rejected a request that the trial be heard as soon as this month, but said it could be heard in June. It is expected to last one or two days.

Apple had opposed the acceleration of the trial and may appeal the decision. It had also challenged Samsung's right to bring the action in the UK.

Apple had previously sued Samsung for infringing its Community designs in Germany and the Netherlands, winning an injunction in the former but not the latter. Further proceedings in both these cases, and in Spain, are expected later this year.

On August 9 last year Samsung filed invalidation actions against the registered design rights at OHIM. Invalidation decisions typically take about a year, so these will also be expected during 2012.

The parties are also contesting various cases to do with patent rights in Europe and elsewhere.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article