Australia prepares to defend plain packaging

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia prepares to defend plain packaging

The Australian government has promised to defend the country’s new law on plain packaging for tobacco products against attacks at the World Trade Organisation

Last week the Ukraine filed a request for consultations with Australia, claiming the introduction of plain packaging laws was inconsistent with Australia’s obligations under the TRIPs Agreement. The request is the first step in a legal dispute at the trade body.

A spokesman from Australia’s Permanent Mission to the WTO told Managing IP by email that Australia will participate in the consultations with Ukraine in a constructive manner but that it is prepared to defend any challenge that might result from them.

A number of other members of the TRIPs Council have previously expressed their concern about the impact of Australia’s new law on the sale of tobacco products and the rights of IP owners to distinguish their brands. They include Mexico, Nigeria, Cuba, Honduras and Zimbabwe. But to date none have notified the WTO of their intent to join the dispute.

The Australian government spokesman said that Australia is pursuing tobacco plain packaging as a public health measure and is confident that these measures are consistent with Australia’s WTO obligations. He added that a number of countries have expressed support for its right to take legitimate public health measures, both in the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade and the TRIPS Council.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Gift this article