ZTE and IBM discuss their international patent strategies

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

ZTE and IBM discuss their international patent strategies

Patents are not only property rights; they are also a means of improving customer relations and breaking into new markets. That was the message from companies including ZTE and IBM at this week’s China-International IP Forum

Shen Jianfeng, director of the IP department at telecoms equipment provider ZTE, described his company’s multi-pronged approach to overseas patent portfolio management.

Patents are the tools we use to penetrate new markets, Shen explained. He stressed however, that ZTE carefully evaluates each potential market before deciding how and whether to develop its IP portfolio there.

We don’t have unlimited funds, so we have to be strategic in which countries we want to enter, he said.

Shen said that when looking at new markets, ZTE considers not only the level of competition there, but also the level of IP protection.

“We classify each country’s legal environment and level of protection as high, medium, and low,” said Shen, to determine what this means for each patent.

Not only do patents provide ZTE with the means to enter and compete in new markets, he said, they are also a stepping stone to ratifying the company’s reputation with customers.

As the company has become bigger, customers look at ZTE’s patent portfolio to evaluate whether it has the technical knowledge to deal with their problems, Shen explained. Having a strong overseas patent portfolio is a sign of the company’s capabilities.

Other rights owners agreed with the need for a selective and carefully considered IP strategy.

“You should not file all of your patents”, said Yang Xuri, IPR director for Peking University Founder Group. He pointed out that only 10% of his organisation’s IP portfolio is filed in the United States.

Companies need to not only understand the technical specifications of their patents, Yang said, but they also need to have a good sense of the commercialisation capabilities. If a piece of technology is not very good, he explained, then the rights owner should weigh the value of the technology against the cost of registering the patent.

Liu Xiaoyu, IP Manager for IBM, said she sees patents as an integral part of the company’s long-term strategy. She said that as one of the largest patent filers worldwide, IBM sees a number of advantages in having a broad patent portfolio.

Patents are an important tool for IBM to maintain its competitive advantage, she said, and are also a source of revenue through licensing.

Another advantage she emphasised was the flexibility that a large portfolio gives the company. Not only can IBM lessen the likelihood of accidental infringement, but it can also use its own patents to enter into cross-licensing agreements with other companies.

A broad portfolio ensures IBM’s freedom of action, so that it can manufacture what it wants and provide the services it wants, she said. “We don’t want to be restrained in our actions.”

The China – International IP Forum took place June 20 and 21 in Beijing.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article