Gucci bests Guess in trade mark fashion case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Gucci bests Guess in trade mark fashion case

Gucci America won a trade mark infringement battle with fashion company Guess on Tuesday, when a New York court awarded the company just over $4.5 million in damages

But the amount awarded fell far short of the more than $100 million the luxury goods company had originally demanded from Guess, which it accused of copying key designs in a way that could confuse consumers.

Patrizio Di Marco, Gucci’s president and chief executive, welcomed the ruling, saying that it should serve as a “powerful deterrent” for those who attempt to unlawfully exploit Gucci’s intellectual property rights.

In a statement, Paul Marciano, CEO of Guess, said damages of about $2.5 million had been ordered against Guess and its handbag and belt licensee and about $2 million against its footwear licensee. The Court has banned Guess from using a version of its Quattro G Diamond pattern that the company says it had already stopped using after Gucci filed its complaint.

He added: “In my opinion, the results in this case show that Gucci grossly overreached in its claims and the entire case could have been avoided with a single letter or phone call. Gucci has also tried to attack Guess in other jurisdictions, but Guess will vigorously defend its rights in all of these cases and is confident that its position will be vindicated.”

You can read more about the background to the Gucci litigation and an analysis of trade mark and design disputes in the fashion industry on Managing IP.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article