Gucci bests Guess in trade mark fashion case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Gucci bests Guess in trade mark fashion case

Gucci America won a trade mark infringement battle with fashion company Guess on Tuesday, when a New York court awarded the company just over $4.5 million in damages

But the amount awarded fell far short of the more than $100 million the luxury goods company had originally demanded from Guess, which it accused of copying key designs in a way that could confuse consumers.

Patrizio Di Marco, Gucci’s president and chief executive, welcomed the ruling, saying that it should serve as a “powerful deterrent” for those who attempt to unlawfully exploit Gucci’s intellectual property rights.

In a statement, Paul Marciano, CEO of Guess, said damages of about $2.5 million had been ordered against Guess and its handbag and belt licensee and about $2 million against its footwear licensee. The Court has banned Guess from using a version of its Quattro G Diamond pattern that the company says it had already stopped using after Gucci filed its complaint.

He added: “In my opinion, the results in this case show that Gucci grossly overreached in its claims and the entire case could have been avoided with a single letter or phone call. Gucci has also tried to attack Guess in other jurisdictions, but Guess will vigorously defend its rights in all of these cases and is confident that its position will be vindicated.”

You can read more about the background to the Gucci litigation and an analysis of trade mark and design disputes in the fashion industry on Managing IP.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article