Interview: Steven Lin, IP counsel at Chinese gaming company Shanda

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Interview: Steven Lin, IP counsel at Chinese gaming company Shanda

stevenlin.jpg

Steven Lin is IP counsel at Shanda Group, a Chinese online computer gaming company that boasts 200 million registered accounts for games such as World of Legend and Chinese Heros. He explains what IP the company owns, how he helps to protect it and which law firms he turns to for assistance

Shanghai-based Shanda Group owns a number of gaming and publishing companies including Shanda Games, Shanda Literature and Nutshell Electronic. Each business has its own legal team which handles day-to-day work, but the legal department of the parent company is responsible for overseeing and developing legal strategy. Steven Lin joined Shanda four years ago. He has practised IP law for almost 10 years and received his SJD in July.

Steven_Lin_Shanda

What sort of IP rights does Shanda have?

In terms of online games we register important business logos where we run businesses. We have applied for domestic copyright registration for all online game software as well as domestic trade marks. Shanda has more than 1,000 registered trade marks. Shanda has also applied for more than 400 patents ranging from a method of online communication to hardware for mobile phones and e-book readers.

Do people outside China play your games?

Shanda Games is pioneering in exploiting overseas markets and has been very successful, especially in south Asia.

What kind of IP disputes has Shanda been involved in?


"Over the past two years we have seen a significant rise in disputes involving unfair competition."


Shanda is a prominent IT corporation and an important IP right holder in China. When it comes to the internet, Shanda is vulnerable to all kinds of IP infringement, especially copyright piracy. Over the past two years we have seen a significant rise in disputes involving unfair competition. Despite the fact that the number of online copyright disputes exceeds all other kinds of IP infringement, I feel many cases are closely related with unfair competition. For example, many games may use identical pictures or scenes from our famous games, or use a name that drops some hint of, or is identical with, names of Shanda games.

Shanda has accused Chinese search engine Baidu of providing links to infringing material. What action did you take?

The case you referred to is an online copyright infringement dispute in which Baidu was ordered to stop the tort and pay compensation of up to Rmb500,000 ($79,000). Copyright infringement by search engines poses a serious threat to Shanda Literature because of the complex nature of the secondary infringement, and because of the important role search engines play in promoting online piracy.

What three things you would most like the Chinese government to do to help protect IP?


"I hope our lawyers can evaluate their capability and strong points fairly and appropriately without exaggerating."


Strengthening the protection of IP rests on the implementation of a comprehensive series of measures. Maybe the most important measures among them are to reinforce the execution of fines for intentional and vicious IP infringement; update current IP legislation to keep up with the latest developments in the internet and other technologies; and improve the execution of judicial decisions.

What law firms have you used to advise Shanda?

We usually employ Co-effort Law firm of Shanghai and Alston Bird and Finnegan in the US. We handle domestic and overseas legal affairs separately.

What do you most appreciate about outside counsel?

I practised as an outside counsel for Shanda for a long time before I became an in-house counsel. I believe outside lawyers are generally more experienced than internal counsel in terms of litigation, and are generally more capable of handling specific affairs. I hope our lawyers can evaluate their capability and strong points fairly and appropriately without exaggerating.

What advice do you have for other IP owners in China?

Protecting IP is in no way easy in China, yet the first thing an IP rights holder should understand is not to complain but to study the unique features of China’s legal background such as the parallel system of administrative and judicial protection, and the significant differences between the Chinese and US patent systems. Only by adapting ourselves to the Chinese environment can we find the best way to protect and develop ourselves well.





more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
Gift this article