Why Samsung's design infringement defence will fail: Reason number two - Koh’s statements exceed the necessary standard

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Why Samsung's design infringement defence will fail: Reason number two - Koh’s statements exceed the necessary standard

Judge Lucy Koh’s findings of extreme similarity in the Apple v Samsung case far exceed the needed similarity for design patent infringement

Return to previous page

apple-rainbow-logo.jpg

That standard says that the accused design need be at least “substantially the same” as the patented design (Gorham v White, US 1871). By using much stronger language, Koh appears to be of the mindset that the accused Samsung tablet easily meets the “substantially the same” infringement standard; so much so that the facts lead to one and only one conclusion - infringement.


While one could argue that her articulations of infringement must be placed in context and limited to the preliminary injunction stage, keep in mind that at that stage, the burdens of proof and persuasion are stacked heavily against the moving party - here, Apple. At trial, the burdens to show infringement are much lower, requiring only a showing by the preponderance of the evidence. In short, since the preliminary injunction stage – as far as hurdles to clear - matters have become easier for Apple, not more difficult.

Reason number three>>

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article