China’s well-known mark scam revealed

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China’s well-known mark scam revealed

If you haven’t heard of some of the brands on China’s list of well-known trade marks, you aren’t alone. Many Chinese haven’t heard of all of them either. A scandal in Henan province that has seen nine lawyers and judges arrested this year in connection with a well-known mark scam might explain why

Caixin reports that the nine are being investigated over allegations that they worked together to ensure that certain trade marks were given well-known status.

Having a well-known mark offers prestige to a brand as well as giving its owners greater powers to block competing marks from the registry. It can be obtained in one of two ways in China: through administrative proceedings such as a trade mark opposition or cancellation action, and through litigation.

The Henan arrests have shone a light on scams in China that lawyers say see company executives pay an individual to infringe their mark. The company files a lawsuit against the willing defendant and in the course of the litigation a friendly judge agrees to declare the plaintiff’s mark well known.

They also come after China’s highest court, the Supreme People’s Court, issued a series of opinions explaining how judges should interpret and apply the country’s IP laws.

Lawyers from Hogan Lovells say that the Opinions from the Supreme People's Court of China on Giving Full Play to the Functional Role of Intellectual Property Trials explain that the courts should carefully examine evidence submitted in support of a claim for well-known status to prevent companies from deliberately creating trademark disputes as a means to seek the recognition of well-known trade mark, suggesting that China’s top judges are aware of scams similar to those alleged to have taken place in Henan.

Deanna Wong of Hogan Lovells told Managing IP that she believes the wide-ranging opinions have led to more reasonable, consistent rulings from Chinese courts.

But she added that while many brand owners focus on obtaining well-known status for their trade marks, there is still uncertainty over the exact level of additional protection it offers.

“Historically it was believed that registered well-known marks would be offered more protection in other classes. But does it also mean that owners of well-known marks will find it easier to enforce their marks?” said Wong. “It may not be as good a weapon as it should be.”

Have you had your mark declared well known in China? If so, share your experiences by clicking on the comment button above.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article