Comment: Why Google tops list of IP's most influential
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Comment: Why Google tops list of IP's most influential

Managing IP's 10th-anniversary list of the most influential people in IP sees Google's Larry Page at number one. Do you agree?

Picking the Top 50 list of the most influential people in IPis never easy. Influence on what? Where? And over what period? Can a big influence in one area, of IP or the world, ever compare with a broader role? Generally in our Top 50 - which we have been running for 10 years now - we prioritise individuals with a core influence, no matter how narrow their remit, and focus on those who will have an impact in the coming months and years.

Some choices are easy. Google has been in the middle of so many pivotal IP disputes across patents, trade marks and copyright that it could qualify for the list three times over. But rather than select three different in-house counsel – or just Fred von Lohmann, as we did last year – we decided to list founder Larry Page. For while challenging IP conventions was never his stated aim, developing such innovative online business models made it inevitable. If you want to scan all the books ever published or photograph every house in the world, you're going to bump up against rights issues.

Putting Page at number one was slightly more controversial, but we think the scope of the issues the company is involved in – also taking in keyword advertising, software copyright, smartphone wars and political lobbying – justified the elevation. Please let us know if you disagree.

Apple was a different proposition, for while the company has been at the heart of smartphone litigation worldwide and notable trade mark cases, several others have shared that influence. More interesting is that so many of the Apple cases involve design rights or user-interface patents – rather than the hidden technologies of networks and servers that have been central to other recent telecoms litigation. British designer Sir Jonathan Ive, therefore, makes our list for his influential product design. As Judge Colin Birss (also listed) said in a recent case, the designs of Apple's competitors are just "not as cool".

Ranking the top 10 individuals in order is a first for Managing IP, but we think it lends some interesting emphasis to those companies, judges, office heads and politicians. Look out too for the five awards given to individuals outside that top 10.

As mentioned we are interested to hear your thoughts on the list, which you can make either in comments to the articles online, or on our LinkedInor Twitterpages (#MIP50).

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners and other senior leaders must step up if they want diverse talent at their firms to thrive
European and US counsel reveal why they are (or aren't) concerned about patent quality and explain how external counsel can help
Firms such as Bird & Bird and Taylor Wessing have reported rising profits and highlighted the role of high-profile IP disputes and hires
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers in the corporate and IP practices discuss where the firm can steal a march on competitors, its growth plans in London, and why deal lawyers are ‘concertmasters’
Kathleen Gaynor, DEI specialist at Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick, says deliberate actions can help law firms reach diversity goals
Scott McKeown, who moved to Wolf Greenfield one year ago, says the change has helped him tap into life sciences work and advise more patent owners
The winners of our Asia-Pacific Awards 2024 will be revealed during a ceremony in Malaysia on September 26
Zach Piccolomini of Wolf Greenfield explains how to maximise your IP portfolio’s value while keeping an eye on competitors
Witnesses at a Congressional hearing debated whether reforming the ITC is necessary and considered what any changes should look like
Gift this article