Novell to appeal dismissal of $1.3 billion antitrust claim against Microsoft
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Novell to appeal dismissal of $1.3 billion antitrust claim against Microsoft

A seven-year lawsuit was thrown out on Monday when a US judge dismissed Novell’s antitrust suit against Microsoft for $1.3 billion

Utah company Novell, which filed the suit in 2004, has confirmed it plans to appeal the decision concerning its WordPerfect writing application.

The dispute stems back to the mid-1990s, when Microsoft made last-minute changes to Windows 95 before launching the operating system. Novell claimed Microsoft intentionally withheld information about the changes, preventing Novell from making its office suite compatible in time for the release. Novell argued that as a result, WordPerfect was unable to compete with Microsoft Word, and it was eventually forced to sell the program at a $1.2 billion loss.

During an eight- week trial which began in October 2011, former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates testified that Novell simply failed to deliver a compatible version of its software in time. When the trial ended with a hung jury in December last year, the judge declared a mistrial.

Microsoft subsequently applied for a motion to dismiss the case under Rule 50, which states that if the jury returns a verdict, the court can allow judgment, order a new trial, or direct the entry of judgment as a matter of law.

US district judge Frederick Motz granted the motion to dismiss. He said that internal issues at Novell, including a “mass exodus” of programmers from its Scotts Valley, California facility, had contributed to the delay in reworking the company’s software. He also noted he had seen no evidence that Novell had ever complained to Microsoft about the problem.

He concluded that while “a jury could have found that Microsoft engaged in aggressive conduct, perhaps to monopolize or attempt to monopolize the applications market”, Novell did not present sufficient evidence for a jury to find that Microsoft violated Section 2 antitrust laws.

David Howard, Microsoft’s deputy general counsel, said in a statement: “We’ve maintained throughout this case that Novell’s arguments lack merit, and we’re gratified with today’s ruling dismissing the last of Novell’s claims and putting this matter to rest.”

Jim Lundberg, vice president of Novell’s legal team, said that although the company is disappointed by the ruling: “Novell still believes in the strength of its claim and we do intend to pursue an appeal."

Microsoft is no stranger to claims that it employs anticompetitive tactics. Its business practices have raised objections from companies including Google, Motorola, and Sun Microsystems, and it has received several multimillion-euro fines from European antitrust officials.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Managing IP’s Max Walters appeared on the latest episode of ‘Two IPs in a pod’, a regular podcast hosted by the UK patent attorney body, to discuss AI, awards and more
Sources at law firms say they have spent more than three years waiting for IP regulations and explain how the delay is affecting their business
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Managing IP will host a ceremony in London on April 11 to reveal the winners of the EMEA Awards 2024
Lawyers reveal what trends they have noticed in the Western District of Texas and the advice they have been giving clients as a result
Concerns over the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation are based on little empirical support, say Benno Buehler and Kilian Mueller of Charles River Associates
Managing IP+ has launched the Talent Tracker, an interactive database that collates reported partner moves across the intellectual property legal market
With the boom in UPC work, the biggest challenge facing the Munich-based firm is recruitment
Gift this article