Bayer’s compulsory licence appeal date set

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bayer’s compulsory licence appeal date set

India’s Intellectual Property Appellate Board will hear Bayer’s appeal of a controversial compulsory licence ruling on August 21 in Chennai, according to Pharmabiz.com

The Controller of Patents issued a compulsory licence in March to domestic generic drug maker Natco for the cancer treatment drug sorafenib.

The German pharmaceutical company filed its appeal with the country’s Intellectual Property Appellate Board on May 4.

The compulsory licence is in force for the remaining term of the patent licence and requires Natco to pay a royalty rate of 6% of net sales of the drug.

The Controller said in March that he was granting the compulsory licence on the grounds (a) that the reasonable requirements of the public with respect to the patented invention had not been satisfied, (b) that the patented invention was not available to the public at a reasonably affordable price, and (c) that the patented invention was not being worked in India.

Bayer attacked the Patent Controller’s ruling in a statement, saying that it “damages the international patent system and endangers pharmaceutical research”.

For more of Managing IP’s coverage of the case, click here and here. More details are available on Pharmabiz.com.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Firm says appointment of Nick McDonald will boost its expertise in cross-border disputes, including at the Unified Patent Court
In the final episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the IP Inclusive Charter and the senior leaders’ pledge
Gift this article