Randall Rader: Defender of the patent system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Randall Rader: Defender of the patent system

The chief judge of the US patent court says the economy depends on patents

rader-randall.jpg

Professor, author, rock star

Professor, author and sometime rock star, to the patent bar Randall Rader is primarily chief judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit – the country's authoritative voice (second, that is, to the Supreme Court) on all things patents. In recent years, the Federal Circuit has presided over feuds on breast cancer gene patents (The Association for Molecular Pathology v the USPTO) and the patent eligibility of diagnostic method claims (Prometheus v Mayo), and is due to issue opinions on joint infringement (Akamai Technologies v Limelight Networks and McKesson Technologies v Epic Systems Corp) this year.


"Innovation is still the key to our recovery, our economy depends on patents"


Born in 1949 in Hastings, Nebraska, Rader studied English at Brigham Young University before earning his law degree at The George Washington University Law School. In 1990, George HW Bush appointed him to the patent court, where he rose to the top job in 2010 upon chief judge Paul Michel's retirement. An avid professor of intellectual property, Rader has taught at his alma mater as well as the University of Virginia School of Law, Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, Georgetown University Law Center, and universities in Beijing and Tokyo.

A staunch defender of the patent system, Rader believes the creation of the Federal Circuit helped lift the US economy from the recession of the early 1980s to its heydays in the 1990s. "That story has some modern application; innovation is still the key to our recovery, our economy depends on patents," Rader once told Managing IP. "Renewed commitment to the principles of innovation can give us the same result again."

Further reading:

Prometheus reiterates broad patent eligibility standard

Lawyers react to Myriad decision

Interview: Randall Rader on the CAFC’s history

Judge Rader defends the patent system

Go to:

Top 50 homepage

Asia Top 50

Americas Top 50

Europe Top 50


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article