Around the world of trademarks in two days

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Around the world of trademarks in two days

“This would normally be a two-week course,” said Charles Gielen, a part-time professor at the University of Groningen, before his presentation on trademark law in Europe

Laughter filled the room, as Gielen now only had one hour.


In a span of two days, the Academic Course on International Trademark Law and Practice provided an informative overview of trademark systems across the globe. Among the audience were students, in-house counsel and other IP practitioners.

“It’s phenomenally useful,” said Paul Determan, a law student at the University of New Hampshire. “How is legislation in other countries different from the U.S.? There’s no other way to get all this information in a span of 48 hours.”


On the first day, trademark experts and professors shared experiences and reviewed registration systems and case law from such regions as Canada, the U.S., Western Europe, South America, Mexico and Central America.


“I have difficulty with the decisions of the European court,” joked Gielen, who also practices at NautaDutilh in Amsterdam.

Gielen gave a briefing on Community trade mark regulations and the difficulties of harmonizing laws among culturally diverse jurisdictions in the region. He was citing a case that involved the rejection of stand-up pouches as three-dimensional marks in 2006, in which the court said the difficulty with such marks is that consumers don’t perceive them as marks.


“These are the same judges who accepted musical notations as marks,” said Gielen. “It’s probably because they played musical instruments.”


But Gielen praised the Court of Justice generally and described the Community trade mark system as “fantastic.” He ended the session by recommending trademark owners to file national marks if they will not be using the marks in a number of jurisdictions.

On day two, lecturers provided a crash course on such regions as Asia-Pacific, Africa and Eastern Europe.


Pravin Anand of Anand and Anand in New Delhi shared recent developments and improvements in trademark law in India. Such improvements include last year’s adoption of the 9th Edition of the Nice classification, which expands the number of classes covered from 42 to 45, and the significant time reduction in litigations.


Anand said that if parties are willing to work together, litigation can finish in six months to a year. The country has also drafted ambush marketing legislation in light of last year’s Commonwealth Games.


While the recent loss of 44,000 trademark files has raised eyebrows about the country’s competence in handling administrative affairs, Anand said the trademarks office has been working hard to encourage trademark owners to look at the list of lost files and putting in money for data restoration.


The two-day course featured 16 different speakers and attracted near 50 attendees each day. It took place at the Marriott Marquis.


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article