Free access: Plain tobacco packaging becomes law in Australia

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Free access: Plain tobacco packaging becomes law in Australia

Australia’s government passed plain packaging legislation today but now faces a legal fight on at least two fronts as the tobacco companies step up their campaign against the law

The Senate passed the legislation earlier this month with a series of amendments that were approved by the House of Representatives today.

This means that from December next year all tobacco sold in Australia will be sold in plain, dark brown packs – with no industry logos, brand imagery, colours or promotional text.

The name of the brand of cigarettes will appear on the pack in a standard font size, colour and position.

Within hours, Philip Morris Asia said that it had served a notice of arbitration under Australia’s Bilateral Investment Treaty with Hong Kong.

"We are left with no option," said Anne Edwards, a spokesperson for Philip Morris Asia, adding that Australia’s government has ignored "serious legal issues associated with plain packaging".

The company wants the legislation to be suspended and compensation to be paid for what it describes as the loss of the company’s trade marks in Australia.

"We are confident that our legal arguments are very strong and that we will ultimately win this case," said Edwards.

The legislation was split into two Bills – Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill 2011 and Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011.

The tobacco companies have consistently argued that the legislation breaches Australia’s commitments under the TRIPs Agreement, violates the country’s constitution and will make it easier for cigarette packets to be counterfeited.

Philip Morris Asia announced its intention to sue the Australian government using the Bilateral Trade Agreement with Hong Kong in June.

The company’s statement today said that its Australian subsidiary will also be pursuing claims under domestic law before the High Court of Australia.

British American Tobacco Australia said earlier this month that it intends to sue the Australian government in the High Court as soon as the legislation receives Royal Assent.

BAT claims that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to remove its property without compensation.

"In years to come plain packaging will be remembered as the legislation which wasted billions of taxpayer’s dollars, caused uncontrollable growth in organised gang activity on the black market and increased smoking rates in young people."

Click here to read all of Managing IP’s coverage of the plain packaging controversy.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
A team from White & Case has checked in on behalf of Premier Inn Hotels in a UK trademark and passing off case against a cookie brand
Litigation team says pre-trial work and a Section 101 defence helped significantly limit damages payable by ride-sharing firm Lyft in patent case
News of Avanci hiring a senior vice president and the EPO teaming up with a French AI startup were also among the top talking points
Explosm, the independent Texas studio behind the hit webcomic Cyanide & Happiness, partnered with Temu’s IP protection team to combat counterfeiters infringing on its brand
The latest in a dispute over juicing machines, and a shakeup in judicial compositions were also among the top developments
Patent partner Robert Hollingshead explains why the firm remains committed to Japan despite several US firms exiting the Japanese and greater Asia market
Emma Green, partner at Bird & Bird, shares why the Iceland v Iceland dispute could prompt businesses and lawyers to think differently about brand enforcement
Gift this article