Free access: Plain tobacco packaging becomes law in Australia

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Free access: Plain tobacco packaging becomes law in Australia

Australia’s government passed plain packaging legislation today but now faces a legal fight on at least two fronts as the tobacco companies step up their campaign against the law

The Senate passed the legislation earlier this month with a series of amendments that were approved by the House of Representatives today.

This means that from December next year all tobacco sold in Australia will be sold in plain, dark brown packs – with no industry logos, brand imagery, colours or promotional text.

The name of the brand of cigarettes will appear on the pack in a standard font size, colour and position.

Within hours, Philip Morris Asia said that it had served a notice of arbitration under Australia’s Bilateral Investment Treaty with Hong Kong.

"We are left with no option," said Anne Edwards, a spokesperson for Philip Morris Asia, adding that Australia’s government has ignored "serious legal issues associated with plain packaging".

The company wants the legislation to be suspended and compensation to be paid for what it describes as the loss of the company’s trade marks in Australia.

"We are confident that our legal arguments are very strong and that we will ultimately win this case," said Edwards.

The legislation was split into two Bills – Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill 2011 and Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011.

The tobacco companies have consistently argued that the legislation breaches Australia’s commitments under the TRIPs Agreement, violates the country’s constitution and will make it easier for cigarette packets to be counterfeited.

Philip Morris Asia announced its intention to sue the Australian government using the Bilateral Trade Agreement with Hong Kong in June.

The company’s statement today said that its Australian subsidiary will also be pursuing claims under domestic law before the High Court of Australia.

British American Tobacco Australia said earlier this month that it intends to sue the Australian government in the High Court as soon as the legislation receives Royal Assent.

BAT claims that it is unconstitutional for the federal government to remove its property without compensation.

"In years to come plain packaging will be remembered as the legislation which wasted billions of taxpayer’s dollars, caused uncontrollable growth in organised gang activity on the black market and increased smoking rates in young people."

Click here to read all of Managing IP’s coverage of the plain packaging controversy.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article