Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Are you ready for 3D printing?

IP owners need to rethink the way that they exploit and enforce their IP rights if they want to meet the challenges of a technology that could revolutionise manufacturing

For now, 3D printers are the stuff of garage hobbyists and corporate R&D labs. But industry analysts say they could transform the way that products are made and distributed, just as the internet shook up the entertainment and music industries.

"Three-dimensional printing is something that's both nothing new and completely new", says Gareth Stokes, a lawyer with DLA Piper. "It has always been possible to take a real world object and make a copy, for example by simply casting a mould. But what 3D printing does is make that process massively easier and cheaper."

Wider access to this ability to copy, both in industry and the home, will be the source of new issues for IP owners, he says.

This month's edition of Managing IP takes an in-depth look at the legal challenges and business opportunities that 3D printing presents. It outlines the IP rights that businesses can use to protect their products from unauthorised copying and provides a five-step guide to planning an effective strategy.

These include strengthening your IP armoury to maximise protection against would-be infringers. One tactic is for rights owners to embed their trade marks into the surface of products susceptible to unauthorised copying. Although it would not enable IP owners to prevent rivals from creating reverse-engineered parts that lacked the trade mark, it would give them greater legal ammunition against anyone selling exact duplicates of their products.

IP owners should also rethink their business models. One way to do this is to look for innovative ways to make the 3D files that allow their products to be printed and use them to generate revenue. Manufacturers should consider coming together to create a parts store, similar to the iTunes model, which allows consumers an easy way to search for and print out spare parts for a small fee. For manufacturers, this means they still have an income stream from spares with no costs of manufacture, transportation or storage.

You can read more in the November issue of Managing IP. If you are not a subscriber, you can access the contents by taking out a free trial.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library
Commissioner Hamano Koichi shares his vision for the JPO and explains that IP offices must promote innovation that drives social change
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
The Supreme Court, which is hearing two IP cases this week, should limit the power of US courts to rule on foreign sales
Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online