Court clarifies plant variety exhaustion

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Court clarifies plant variety exhaustion

The owner of a plant variety right can bring an infringement action against a third party that has obtained material from a licensee, if the licensee has contravened the licence “to the extent that the conditions or limitations in question relate directly to the essential features of the Community plant variety right concerned”

This is the case even if the third party was aware or was deemed to be aware of the conditions or limitations imposed in the licence, the Court of Justice of the EU has judged.

The Court was ruling in a dispute brought by Greenstar-Kanzi Europe, which had acquired the exclusive right to the plant variety for Nicoter apple trees, against Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens.

They had bought 7,000 Nicoter trees from a company called Nicolaï, which had a licence to the plant variety right.

When the lower courts in Belgium diverged over whether or not Hustin and Goossens were bound by the contractual restrictions imposed on Nicolaï, the Court of Cassation referred two questions to the Court of Justice of the EU.

Plant varieties are protected in the EU by Regulation 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights, amended by Regulation 873/2004.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Gift this article