Court clarifies plant variety exhaustion

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Court clarifies plant variety exhaustion

The owner of a plant variety right can bring an infringement action against a third party that has obtained material from a licensee, if the licensee has contravened the licence “to the extent that the conditions or limitations in question relate directly to the essential features of the Community plant variety right concerned”

This is the case even if the third party was aware or was deemed to be aware of the conditions or limitations imposed in the licence, the Court of Justice of the EU has judged.

The Court was ruling in a dispute brought by Greenstar-Kanzi Europe, which had acquired the exclusive right to the plant variety for Nicoter apple trees, against Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens.

They had bought 7,000 Nicoter trees from a company called Nicolaï, which had a licence to the plant variety right.

When the lower courts in Belgium diverged over whether or not Hustin and Goossens were bound by the contractual restrictions imposed on Nicolaï, the Court of Cassation referred two questions to the Court of Justice of the EU.

Plant varieties are protected in the EU by Regulation 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights, amended by Regulation 873/2004.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
Gift this article