Court clarifies plant variety exhaustion

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Court clarifies plant variety exhaustion

The owner of a plant variety right can bring an infringement action against a third party that has obtained material from a licensee, if the licensee has contravened the licence “to the extent that the conditions or limitations in question relate directly to the essential features of the Community plant variety right concerned”

This is the case even if the third party was aware or was deemed to be aware of the conditions or limitations imposed in the licence, the Court of Justice of the EU has judged.

The Court was ruling in a dispute brought by Greenstar-Kanzi Europe, which had acquired the exclusive right to the plant variety for Nicoter apple trees, against Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens.

They had bought 7,000 Nicoter trees from a company called Nicolaï, which had a licence to the plant variety right.

When the lower courts in Belgium diverged over whether or not Hustin and Goossens were bound by the contractual restrictions imposed on Nicolaï, the Court of Cassation referred two questions to the Court of Justice of the EU.

Plant varieties are protected in the EU by Regulation 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights, amended by Regulation 873/2004.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Although unanimous decision by the top court clarifies several aspects of the honest concurrent use defence, practitioners say ambiguities remain
Tristan Sherliker says he hopes to solve an access to justice issue by making the automated court bundle tool free to use
The team, comprising two partners and one senior consultant, plans to offer “highly differentiated” services to clients
HGF’s new ownership model frees it from the hiring constraints of traditional partnerships, its CEO told Managing IP
New timeline for 2026 aims to provide clearer guidance to firms and practitioners on the full jurisdictional market view
Attorneys contemplate whether clients using AI for legal guidance is beneficial to attorney-client relationships or more of a nuisance
Richard de Bodo, who had a lengthy career at international firms, shares how he will address client needs and praises the unique offerings of smaller firms
An Australian top court decision clarifying honest concurrent use and wins by publishers against AI platforms were also among the top talking points
AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has delayed hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate
Despite being outspent by a wealthy opponent, a trial attorney at King & Spalding says ‘relentless pursuit of the truth’ helped his team secure a $420m damages award for mobile gaming client
Gift this article