SCOTUS to review Postal Service patent case
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

SCOTUS to review Postal Service patent case

US Supreme Court Joao 168

Cert granted in Return Mail v United States Postal Service, which asks whether the government is a "person" who may petition to institute review proceedings under the AIA

US Surpreme Court Joao

The Supreme Court yesterday granted cert to Return Mail v United States Postal Service. In this case, an Alabama company accused the Postal Service of improperly convincing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to cancel its patent for a mail processing system.

The court granted cert to only the firstquestion presented, which is: “Whether the government is a 'person' who may petition to institute review proceedings under the AIA.”

John O’Quinn, partner at Kirkland & Ellis, commented: “The Court is once again taking a case to work through statutory interpretation questions in the AIA.

“In this case, the Court is confronted with the meaning of the term ‘person’, which can be fairly broad.  However, the question is really whether one agency of the government can be in the business of challenging whether another agency of the government erred in issuing a patent -- if one federal agency and another disagree, they normally do not litigate over it.  So it’s against that backdrop that the Supreme Court has to interpret the meaning of ‘person’.”

Ropes & Gray IP litigation attorneys Scott McKeown and Matt Rizzolo commented in a statement: “It’s worth noting that Supreme Court’s grant in Return Mail bears an interesting resemblance to how SAS Institute v Iancu, decided this past term, found its way to the Court – with Judge Newman dissenting from the Federal Circuit’s opinion on a discrete issue of statutory interpretation, followed by a successful cert petition on that same issue.”

This is the fourth IP case the Supreme Court has taken on this term, making it two patent cases and two copyright cases.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Firms explain how monitoring, referrals and relationships with foreign firms helped them get more work at the TTAB
Luke Toft explains why he moved back to Fox Rothschild after working in-house at Sleep Number for five months
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
In a seminal ruling, the Beijing Internet Court said images generated by Stable Diffusion counted as original works
Boston-based John Lanza is hoping to work more with life sciences colleagues on the ‘exciting’ application of AI to drug discovery
The Delhi High Court has expressed its willingness to set global licensing terms in the Nokia-Oppo dispute, but it must deal with longstanding problems first
Some patent counsel are still encountering errors even though the USPTO has fully transitioned to the new system
A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career