Mexico: Amendments introduce new rules for international trade mark registrations
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Amendments introduce new rules for international trade mark registrations

It is widely known that amendments to the Mexican Law of Industrial Property which have an impact on trade marks came into full force on August 10 2018. Especially relevant is the Declaration of Effective Use (DOU) to preserve trade mark protection. A first DOU is provided for those registrations granted from August 10 2018 and must be filed within three months of the third anniversary of the date of grant of the registration. Failure to file the DOU will cause the registration to lapse. In turn, for renewal purposes, a DOU must be filed. In both cases the DOU's must specify the goods/services for which the trade mark is effectively in use in Mexico. Protection will remain only for those specific goods or services.

With respect to international registrations designating Mexico relevant rules have been published in the Official Diary of September 6 2018. According to them, a DOU must be filed at the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) within three months of the third anniversary of the national registration including the list of goods/services on which the mark is effectively used in Mexico. Regarding renewals, the rules provide that once the titleholder of the international registration has been notified of the renewal from WIPO, the titleholder must file the DOU within the next three months specifying the goods/services on which the trade mark has been effectively used in Mexico provided that the national registration has been granted for at least three years.

There will not be an official action requesting the titleholders of the international registrations to file the DOU, so it is convenient to appoint a Mexican lawyer to monitor deadlines.

mnr.jpg

Mauricio Narváez


OlivaresSan Ángel

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In-house counsel explain how they develop or maintain 'IP-aware' cultures at their companies and how private practice lawyers can help
Josh Budwin, principal at the firm, said the case was one of the most complex technology disputes he's ever worked on
For the latest article in our regular series covering UPC developments, we summarise five rulings and highlight what’s expected later this month
John Keville, partner at Sheppard Mullin, explains how he secured a patent subject matter eligibility victory for his client against GoPro
An IP partner at Womble Bond Dickinson explains how its combination with Lewis Roca will create a fully-rounded litigation and prosecution service
Ronen Speyer of Evalueserve explains why in a competitive business landscape, IP has become a key driver in gaining a competitive advantage
Michael Sharp, who moved to Canadian firm Field Law from Aurora Cannabis in June, said he is enjoying cross-practice collaboration at his new firm
Yasemin Kenaroğlu tells us about setting up ‘IP School’, Turkish coffee, and why IP is like an iceberg
Irena Royzman, who joined Orrick earlier this year, explains how she's collaborated with her new colleagues to address IP policy concerns
Partners at Fenwick explain why they had to be aggressive when helping Lashify win a patent infringement trial
Gift this article