Greece: Compulsory mediation restricts access to justice

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Compulsory mediation restricts access to justice

In early 2018, a radical change to civil procedure was introduced as a result of Law 4512/2018. The change relates to compulsory mediation as an obligatory pre-trial stage for certain civil and commercial disputes. IP-related cases are included in these. Thus, before the filing of any IP-related main action lawsuit, the claimant must follow the designated mediation process, so that there is no procedural impediment to the trial. These legal provisions were scheduled to apply to any main action lawsuits filed from October 17 2018.

Criticism was voiced against these provisions. Critics noted that the mandatory nature of the mediation contradicts the fundamental right of access to justice. In relation to access to justice, objections also arose regarding compulsory mediation costs, as well as the fact that the mediator who is appointed should not necessarily be a lawyer. In light of this criticism, the Plenary of the Greek Bar Associations filed a request before the Greek Supreme Court in order to decide on the constitutionality of the compulsory mediation provisions.

In its Decision No. 34/2018, the Plenary of the Greek Supreme Court ruled by majority that the compulsory mediation provisions contradict the Greek Constitution (Article 20.1), the European Convention on Human Rights (Articles 6.1 and 13) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Article 47), namely by restricting the fundamental right of access to justice.

In view of the above, and as a result of a recently filed amendment to the Law, the application of compulsory mediation has been suspended until September 16 2019 in order for the above provisions to be in accordance with the decision of the Plenary of the Greek Supreme Court. It will be interesting to see whether, in the meantime, mandatory mediation for IP-related cases is eliminated.

panagopoulos.jpg

Georgios Panagopoulos

Patrinos & Kilimiris

7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.

GR-11528 Athens

Greece

Tel: +30210 7222906, 7222050

Fax: +30210 7222889

info@patrinoskilimiris.com

www.patrinoskilimiris.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article