Greece: Compulsory mediation restricts access to justice

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Compulsory mediation restricts access to justice

In early 2018, a radical change to civil procedure was introduced as a result of Law 4512/2018. The change relates to compulsory mediation as an obligatory pre-trial stage for certain civil and commercial disputes. IP-related cases are included in these. Thus, before the filing of any IP-related main action lawsuit, the claimant must follow the designated mediation process, so that there is no procedural impediment to the trial. These legal provisions were scheduled to apply to any main action lawsuits filed from October 17 2018.

Criticism was voiced against these provisions. Critics noted that the mandatory nature of the mediation contradicts the fundamental right of access to justice. In relation to access to justice, objections also arose regarding compulsory mediation costs, as well as the fact that the mediator who is appointed should not necessarily be a lawyer. In light of this criticism, the Plenary of the Greek Bar Associations filed a request before the Greek Supreme Court in order to decide on the constitutionality of the compulsory mediation provisions.

In its Decision No. 34/2018, the Plenary of the Greek Supreme Court ruled by majority that the compulsory mediation provisions contradict the Greek Constitution (Article 20.1), the European Convention on Human Rights (Articles 6.1 and 13) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Article 47), namely by restricting the fundamental right of access to justice.

In view of the above, and as a result of a recently filed amendment to the Law, the application of compulsory mediation has been suspended until September 16 2019 in order for the above provisions to be in accordance with the decision of the Plenary of the Greek Supreme Court. It will be interesting to see whether, in the meantime, mandatory mediation for IP-related cases is eliminated.

panagopoulos.jpg

Georgios Panagopoulos

Patrinos & Kilimiris

7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.

GR-11528 Athens

Greece

Tel: +30210 7222906, 7222050

Fax: +30210 7222889

info@patrinoskilimiris.com

www.patrinoskilimiris.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Latham & Watkins bolstered its IP litigation bench in California with the addition of Kieran Kieckhefer, as partner demand for trial-ready expertise shows no sign of slowing
With the launch of a new patent eligibility AI tool, Sterne Kessler is leading a growing movement of law firms taking AI development into their own hands
UPC cases are (very) gradually becoming more distributed across other local divisions outside Germany, which can only be good news for the pan-European forum
Clarification concerning jurisdictional reach and latest stats released by the court were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
Although unanimous decision by the top court clarifies several aspects of the honest concurrent use defence, practitioners say ambiguities remain
Tristan Sherliker says he hopes to solve an access to justice issue by making the automated court bundle tool free to use
The team, comprising two partners and one senior consultant, plans to offer “highly differentiated” services to clients
HGF’s new ownership model frees it from the hiring constraints of traditional partnerships, its CEO told Managing IP
New timeline for 2026 aims to provide clearer guidance to firms and practitioners on the full jurisdictional market view
Attorneys contemplate whether clients using AI for legal guidance is beneficial to attorney-client relationships or more of a nuisance
Gift this article