France: Law on national domain images changes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Law on national domain images changes

Sponsored by

beau-de-lomenie.png

A French court issued a ruling on April 13 2018 concerning the photographs of Chambord Castle used by Kronenbourg breweries in the context of an advertising campaign for one of their beers.

The case asked whether the castle, which is part of the public domain of the French state, can be reproduced without financial compensation or authorisation from the public institution.

Previously, commercial exploitation of a photograph of a private building has been allowed, without prior authorisation or any financial compensation, unless the photo caused abnormal disturbance to the owner of the building or if the owner had copyright on that building.

The court confirmed this ruling and rejected the argument that such commercial operation could be considered as private use of the public domain. Deciding differently would restrain the freedom of entrepreneurship.

This decision was, however, made prior to Law No. 2016-925 of July 7 2016 on the freedom of creation, architecture and heritage.

Now a specific system is set up for image rights of goods falling under the category of "national domain". A first list of six monuments and estates was submitted by the Ministry of Culture and Communication and validated by the Historical Monuments National Commission. On this list were the Chambord Estate, the Castle of Angers, the Palais du Rhin in Strasburg, the Estate of Pau, the Louvre and Tuileries Estates in Paris (1st) and the Palais de l'Elysée in Paris (8th).

Article L. 621-42 of the Heritage Code means that prior authorisation and potential financial compensation are now the rule for using an image of such buildings.

However, such authorisation is not required when the image also pursues a cultural, educational, research or information purpose or is linked to a public service task.

A decree should provide details about the concept of "commercial purpose".

marie.jpg

Aurélia Marie


Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

contact@bdl-ip.com

www.bdl-ip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
The government’s keenly awaited view on AI and copyright has positive themes but leaves rights owners wanting, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
While IP Australia’s updated manual could be favourable to computer-implemented inventions, stakeholders would like to see whether a consistent and reliable standard is followed during actual examination
UKIPO will remain a competitive option as long as efficient service continues
A future opt-out has not been ruled out, but practitioners warn that the UK could fall behind in the AI race
US patent lawyers say they are increasingly advising clients on China strategies as corporations seek to gain leverage in enforcement, licensing, and supply chain management
Mike Rueckheim reunites with 12 of his former Winston & Strawn colleagues as King & Spalding continues aggressive hiring streak
As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
Gift this article