The Philippines: Starwood proves use of trade mark through online transactions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

The Philippines: Starwood proves use of trade mark through online transactions

Does a trade mark owner have to be physically present in the Philippines to show genuine use of a mark? In the case of W Land Holdings Inc v Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide Inc (G.R. No. 222366, December 4 2017), the Supreme Court (SC) ruled in favour of Starwood, asserting that it makes actual use of its W mark in the Philippines. This case arose from a cancellation action filed with the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL).

On May 29 2009, W Land, a real estate company, filed an action to cancel Starwood's trade mark registration for its W mark on the ground that Starwood had failed to use its mark because it had no hotel or establishment in the Philippines offering the services covered by its registration. Starwood denied having abandoned its W mark, and alleged that it had already filed a Declaration of Actual Use in 2008 which was accepted by the IPOPHL. It argued that it operates an interactive website to accommodate its potential clients worldwide and allows Philippine residents to make reservations and bookings, clearly showing use of the W mark in the Philippines.

The SC, affirming the decisions of the Office of the Director General of the IPOPHL and the Court of Appeal, explained and held as follows:

i) There must be bona fide use of the mark, not token use. This may be characterised as use which results or tends to result, in one way or another, in a commercial interaction or transaction in the ordinary course of business. The mere exhibition of goods or services over the internet is not enough to constitute actual use. It must be shown that the trade mark owner has actually transacted or intentionally targeted customers of a particular jurisdiction. Showing an actual commercial link to the country is therefore imperative.

ii) Starwood proved that it owns Philippine registered domain names, for example, www.whotels.ph and www.wreservations.ph. These websites are readily accessible to Philippine citizens and residents and they can use them to instantaneously book and pay for their accommodation, with immediate confirmation, in any of its W hotels. It further presented data of the growing number of internet users in the Philippines visiting its website since 2003, and thus, taken together Starwood showed that use of the W mark through its interactive website was intended to produce and establish commercial interaction with Philippine consumers.

iii) Starwood submitted in 2008 its Declaration of Actual Use (DAU) which the IPOPHL accepted and recognised as valid. The SC found no reason to disturb this recognition.

Hechanova

Editha R Hechanova


Hechanova & Co., Inc.Salustiana D. Ty Tower104 Paseo de Roxas AvenueMakati City 1229, PhilippinesTel: (63) 2 812-6561Fax: (63) 2 888-4290editharh@hechanova.com.ph 

www.hechanova.com.ph

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
Gift this article