Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: 2024 Olympic Games create trade mark challenges

Sponsored by


Paris will welcome the summer Olympic Games in 2024. This is a huge challenge for the Organising Committee.

The licensing policy of the Olympic Committee of the Olympic signs and symbols is an important aspect of the games and a bill is under discussion in the French Parliament to extend the rights of the National Olympic and Paralympic Committees to the logo, the slogan and the mascot that will be specifically created for the occasion.

These provisions will complete the Sports Code which provides, in Article L.141-5, for the protection of the Olympic signs. As a result, the filing as a trade mark or the reproduction, imitation, affixation, removal or modification of such signs constitutes counterfeiting and is punished as such.

The bill in discussion also provides that terms such as Olympique (Olympic), Olympisme (Olympism), Jeux Olympiques (Olympic Games) and Paris 2024 will be protected. However, this extension has led to criticism and an amendment was proposed to limit the protection to use made with reference to the Olympic Games of the modern age, or to sporting competitions or practice.

Up until now, French jurisdictions have differentiated between using such words in order to inform the public for instance, on a well-known result or to announce a future game, and their exploitation for commercial purposes. Reproduction of a sport result already public and reference to a future competition already announced do not constitute infringment. Trade mark infringement occurs when the use is made for commercial purposes and not for information purposes.

Even if fighting against counterfeits is more important than ever, one assumes that the balance between trade mark rights and freedom of expression and information will nevertheless continue to exist.

Aurélia Marie

Emmanuelle Machinet

Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A Court of Appeal judge demanded respect for solicitor-judges after reprimanding a barrister for his 'unwise' words
Speeches at the UPC inauguration highlighted the gap between the unitary patent dream and the reality today
Sources with experience on both sides of the Atlantic believe hugely profitable US law firms may still take some convincing before agreeing to partner with a UK outfit
IP counsel urge the government to restrict safe harbour exceptions available to intermediaries and clear up doubts with the existing law
A New York lawyer could face sanctions after citing fake judgments generated by ChatGPT, but that doesn’t mean practitioners should shy away from AI
Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Sukanya Sarkar shares her thoughts on this year’s annual meeting in Singapore, where debates ranged from AI opportunities to improving law firm culture
The court’s ruling is a good reminder that US parties aren’t guaranteed attorney fees just because they win, say sources
With business confidence in a shaky state, Rachel Tan and Lisa Yong of Rouse discuss how in-house IP teams can manage their trademark portfolios through uncertain times