Taiwan: Utility model patents in Taiwan
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taiwan: Utility model patents in Taiwan

Filing a utility model application for an invention can be a quick way to obtain patent rights in Taiwan. A utility model application will mature into a registration with a duration of 10 years from the filing date as soon as the formality requirements are fulfilled. However, as a utility model application filed in Taiwan is not subject to a substantive examination looking at novelty and inventive step, before a utility model patent holder can enforce his right against an infringer, he needs to ask Taiwan's IP Office to produce a technical evaluation report in which prior art references are cited (if any) and the relevance of these to each claim is specified. The scope of the claims of a utility model patent might need to be restricted in light of the references cited by the IP Office.

According to current practice, a petition for amendment filed independently of an invalidation action is only subject to a formality examination. Taiwan's IP Office now adopts a different threshold from that of substantive examination. During a formality examination, the IP Office would generally consider a slight modification of the wording in the recitations of the claims to be a substantial change. This makes it quite difficult for the patent holder to obtain a favourable technical evaluation report when it comes to cited art.

Moreover, a utility model patent holder might need to submit a petition for claim amendment before the IP Office if he filed an infringement lawsuit and the accused infringer, in turn, filed a defence of patent invalidity as a countermeasure. In this case, the petition can be dismissed for failing the formality test even if the scope of the amended claims does not go beyond the originally filed claim or is narrower than the original claims.

To ensure the stability of utility model patent rights and to limit problems arising from filing claim amendments during a civil litigation procedure or application for a utility model technical evaluation report, both of which are subject to a formality examination, the IP Office is about to revise relevant regulations. It proposes prohibiting the filing of petitions for amendment of the claims of utility model patents in the absence of an invalidation action, an application for a technical evaluation report or a pending civil litigation case. Moreover, amendments to the claims of utility model patents shall be examined substantively. In the hope of establishing a sound claim amendment system for utility model patents, the IP Office is ready to revise patent law if a consensus can be reached at the forthcoming public hearings.

Yen-bin Gu


Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices7th Floor, No. 248, Section 3Nanking East RoadTaipei 105-45, Taiwan, ROCTel: +886 2 2775 1823Fax: +886 2 2731 6377siiplo@mail.saint-island.com.twwww.saint-island.com.tw

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Gift this article