Taiwan: Utility model patents in Taiwan

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taiwan: Utility model patents in Taiwan

Filing a utility model application for an invention can be a quick way to obtain patent rights in Taiwan. A utility model application will mature into a registration with a duration of 10 years from the filing date as soon as the formality requirements are fulfilled. However, as a utility model application filed in Taiwan is not subject to a substantive examination looking at novelty and inventive step, before a utility model patent holder can enforce his right against an infringer, he needs to ask Taiwan's IP Office to produce a technical evaluation report in which prior art references are cited (if any) and the relevance of these to each claim is specified. The scope of the claims of a utility model patent might need to be restricted in light of the references cited by the IP Office.

According to current practice, a petition for amendment filed independently of an invalidation action is only subject to a formality examination. Taiwan's IP Office now adopts a different threshold from that of substantive examination. During a formality examination, the IP Office would generally consider a slight modification of the wording in the recitations of the claims to be a substantial change. This makes it quite difficult for the patent holder to obtain a favourable technical evaluation report when it comes to cited art.

Moreover, a utility model patent holder might need to submit a petition for claim amendment before the IP Office if he filed an infringement lawsuit and the accused infringer, in turn, filed a defence of patent invalidity as a countermeasure. In this case, the petition can be dismissed for failing the formality test even if the scope of the amended claims does not go beyond the originally filed claim or is narrower than the original claims.

To ensure the stability of utility model patent rights and to limit problems arising from filing claim amendments during a civil litigation procedure or application for a utility model technical evaluation report, both of which are subject to a formality examination, the IP Office is about to revise relevant regulations. It proposes prohibiting the filing of petitions for amendment of the claims of utility model patents in the absence of an invalidation action, an application for a technical evaluation report or a pending civil litigation case. Moreover, amendments to the claims of utility model patents shall be examined substantively. In the hope of establishing a sound claim amendment system for utility model patents, the IP Office is ready to revise patent law if a consensus can be reached at the forthcoming public hearings.

Yen-bin Gu


Saint Island International Patent & Law Offices7th Floor, No. 248, Section 3Nanking East RoadTaipei 105-45, Taiwan, ROCTel: +886 2 2775 1823Fax: +886 2 2731 6377siiplo@mail.saint-island.com.twwww.saint-island.com.tw

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article