Austria: The difficulties of establishing two trade marks

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austria: The difficulties of establishing two trade marks

Sponsored by

sonn-400px.png

During the time of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, a famous hotel existed in Vienna. Its name was Meissl & Schadn and its restaurant was very well-known for its high-end beef dishes.

For some decades now, a well-known chain of restaurants in Vienna that specialises in high-quality beef dishes has existed. Its name is Plachutta.

In 2000 Plachutta registered the trade mark Meissl & Schadn in class 42 for the running of restaurants and cafés. It was for use as a secondary trade mark. In brochures, menus, its cookbooks and other material it purported to continue the tradition of the old Meissl & Schadn and saw itself as its successor.

A short time ago, a new hotel opened on the prestigious Ring with a fashionable old Viennese-style restaurant called Meissl & Schadn. This restaurant also specialises in traditional, high-end Viennese cooking, using beef as the basis of many of its dishes. The existence of the trade mark Meissl & Schadn registered in the name of an established, famous competitor posed too great a danger to the new business. As a result, a cancellation action was started on the basis of non-use.

Plachutta used the trade mark Meissl & Schadn solely in print and that too only in order to point to the tradition of Viennese beef cooking. The trade mark had no specific and concrete connections to certain services which would enable consumers to distinguish these services from those of other enterprises. However, this is the essence and purpose of trademarks. Consumers were not able to distinguish the origin of certain specific services by hearing or reading the trade mark Meissl & Schadn from the same services offered by others. Consequently, a trade mark was not established. The mere use of it as a reference to an old tradition did not suffice. The trade mark Meissl & Schadn was cancelled due to non-use.

Normally, restaurant services are carried out under the name of the restaurant and this is also its trademark. The above case shows the difficulties that arise when trying to establish a second trade mark.

sonn.jpg

Helmut Sonn



SONN & PARTNER Patentanwälte

Riemergasse 14

A-1010 Vienna, Austria

Tel: +43 1 512 84 05

Fax: +43 1 512 98 05

office@sonn.at

www.sonn.at

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm is continuing its aggressive IP hiring streak with the addition of partner Matthew Rizzolo
Pantech counsel Shogo Matsunaga speaks exclusively to Managing IP about how his team proved Google’s unwillingness, and ultimately secured a landmark SEP settlement
New partners, including the firm’s first female head of a department, are eyeing a deeper focus on client understanding
Chunguang Hu of China PAT explains why his ‘insider’ experience as a patent examiner benefits clients and why he wants to debunk the myth that IP has limited value in China
Essenese Obhan shares his expansion plans and vision of creating a ‘one-stop shop’ for clients after Indian firms Obhan & Associates and Mason & Associates joined forces
From AI and the UPC to troublesome trademarks in China, experts name the IP trends likely to dominate 2026
Colm Murphy says he is keen to help clients navigate cross-border IP challenges in Europe
With 2025 behind us, US practitioners sit down with Managing IP to discuss the major IP moments from the year and what to expect in 2026
Large-scale transatlantic mergers will give US entities a strong foothold at the UPC, and could spark further fragmentation of European patent practices
This year’s most-read stories covered uncertainty at the USPTO, a potential boycott of a major international IP conference, rankings releases, and a contempt of court proceeding
Gift this article