Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European designs: The CJEU gives its interpretation of the “repair clause”

Sponsored by


The question of the protection of spare parts by designs has always been controversial.

Article 110 §1, i.e. the "repair clause", of Council Regulation (EC) n°6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs, excludes from protection as European design, component parts of a complex product, used to repair this product, to give it back its initial appearance.

On December 20 2017, the CJUE decided on article 110 §1 in respect of the manufacture and the commercialization by of wheel rims protected by European designs. The defendant, sued for infringement, asserted under article 110 §1, that no protection regarding those designs could be opposed against him. (Audi and Porsche joined cases C-397/16 and C-435/16)

For the Court, the shape of those parts does not need to be prescribed by the appearance of the complex product appearance they belong to.

Then parts such as wheel rims are concerned by article 110 §1 even if they can vary, depending on types and options available on a same vehicle.

These parts must be components, that can be replaced in order to allow the disassembly and reassembly of one product, and without which it could not be used normally.

They must be used for repairing a product that has become defective, and not for "pleasure or simple convenience".

The "repair clause" applies only to parts of a complex product, visually identical to the original parts. If this condition of identity is not met, the exclusive right of the design's owner may be infringed.

Finally, the Court suggests imposing a duty of information that manufacturers or sellers are not the owners of the designs and that the parts can only be used for repairing, to give back the original appearance of the product.

Aurélia Marie

Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Sukanya Sarkar shares her thoughts on this year’s annual meeting in Singapore, where debates ranged from AI opportunities to improving law firm culture
The court’s ruling is a good reminder that US parties aren’t guaranteed attorney fees just because they win, say sources
With business confidence in a shaky state, Rachel Tong and Lisa Yong of Rouse discuss how in-house IP teams can manage their trademark portfolios through uncertain times
The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor
Funders and NPEs say asserting patent portfolios can minimise risk at the USPTO’s PTAB, where procedure remains a controversial topic
The US Supreme Court’s ruling wasn’t a surprise and reflects a trend that had already been bubbling away for a while, say tech and pharma counsel
Previous attempts at major transatlantic tie-ups have failed, so lawyers will keep their eyes firmly on Allen & Overy’s grand plans
INTA CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo shares his plans if he were to win the EUIPO leadership race and says his application does not affect his INTA role
The French finance minister told António Campinos the timing of an EPO event in Lisbon could be seen as interference in the EUIPO leadership race