Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Thailand: Sound marks in Thailand

Registration of sound marks in Thailand has been legally possible since the Thai Trademark Act (No. 3) B.E. 2558 (A.D. 2015) came into force on July 28 2016. However, such registrations remained only a possibility that didn't mature into reality. On September 1 2017, new Ministerial Regulations were issued and guidelines published that provide clarification on the sound mark application process in Thailand as well as details on how to properly complete the revised trade mark application form to claim protection for sound marks.

After July 28 2016, the Thai Trademark Act in Paragraph 2 of Section 7, states that:

“A trademark having or comprising any of the following essential characteristics shall be deemed distinctive. (11) a sound having no direct reference to the character or quality of the goods or a sound which is not the natural sound of the goods or a sound which does not result from the functioning of the goods”

From this wording, the regular standard of descriptiveness applicable to traditional word and device marks has been transplanted into the examination process of sound marks, with additional conditions specific to sound marks; i.e., that the sound must not be the natural sound of the goods and does not result from a function of the goods. As sounds made by the goods or resulting from the functioning of the goods can, in most cases, be considered characteristics of such goods, these added conditions merely constitute a mark type-specific application of the ordinary descriptiveness analysis.

While numerous lines of analysis were proposed surrounding sound mark registrations in Thailand at the time of enactment of the Trademark Act B.E. 2558 (A.D. 2015), very few practical developments ensued, until July 3 2017, when the official trade mark Application Form was amended to include a new space especially dedicated to sound marks. This new application form provided a concrete channel for mark owners to file for their sound marks, however there were no official practical guidelines on how to apply for protection of sound marks within the Thai system, which remains largely paper-based.

On September 1 2017, the Ministry of Commerce issued Ministerial Regulations No. 5 (B.E. 2560) (A.D. 2017). These Regulations deal with a multitude of issues under the Trademark Act, while Article 6 provides brief clarification on the sound mark application process as follows:

1) The Applicant must provide a clear description of the sound mark

2) The Applicant must submit such sound clearly recorded in a recording medium

3) The Applicant may also submit staff notation, spectrograms or other forms of transcription so as to complete the description of the sound

Further, on September 1 2017, the Department of Intellectual Property also published its updated guidelines on how to fill out trade mark application forms that now include a section on applications for sound marks. Points of note are:

1) The Applicant must indicate whether the mark is a) a human sound, b) an animal sound, c) musical (melodic) sound or d) other type of sound.

2) The description of the mark should include the context in which the mark is used (e.g., melody of bell ringing played before a news report) as well as the closest Thai syllabic expression of the melody.

3) Acceptable recording mediums include USB flash drives or CDs.

From these guidelines, there could be as many as four types of representations of one sound mark submitted with the application form. The numerous types of transcriptions and notations required to support a sound mark application are aimed – in part – at enabling the Trademark Office to compile different types of indices that will facilitate the process of similarity examination.

With these clear, practical guidelines, it will be easier for applicants and their advisors alike to master the application filing process for sound marks in Thailand.

Daniel Greif

Dhanasun Chumchuay

Spruson & Ferguson

Nos. 496-502 Amarin Plaza BuildingUnit Nos. 1806-1807, 18th Floor, Ploenchit Road, Lumpini Sub-District, Pathumwan District, Bangkok 10330 Thailand

Tel: +66 2 305 6893

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China
Two orders denying public access to documents have reignited a debate over a lack of transparency at the new court
Rouse’s new chief of operations and the firm’s CEO tell Managing IP why they think private equity backing will help it conquer Europe
Brian Landry, partner at Saul Ewing, reveals how applicants can prosecute patent applications in the wake of the Federal Circuit's In re Cellect ruling
Ronelle Geldenhuys of Australia’s Foundry IP considers the implications complex computer technologies such as AI have on decision-making