United Kingdom: A matter of opinion
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

United Kingdom: A matter of opinion

The UKIPO has long provided the means for any third party to obtain an independent opinion on questions of validity and infringement in relation to granted UK and EP(UK) patents. More recently this service has been extended, for example by allowing additional grounds of invalidity to be raised, leading to a surge in its popularity among clients operating in the UK.

Any person may request the UKIPO to provide an opinion on validity or infringement of a UK or EP(UK) patent. However, opinions are typically requested by a patent holder, an exclusive licensee of the patent or a third party for whom a patent poses an infringement risk.

When filing any request for an opinion, it is essential to set out the evidence and arguments that support your position. For example, when arguing for invalidity, any request for an opinion should include detailed reasoning in relation to each ground of invalidity raised while highlighting relevant prior art documents. Alternatively, when arguing for an opinion of infringement, it is important to set out the facts relating to any potentially infringing products and acts.

While any opinion issued is non-binding, the position of the UKIPO may assist in formulating an overall commercial strategy surrounding the patent right in question, and strengthen a position in mediation. Additionally, the opinion system offers a further advantage in that a finding of patent claim invalidity may cause the UKIPO to begin the process of revocation in the UK. This process is only undertaken on patents the UKIPO deem to be clearly invalid.

The UKIPO may begin revocation proceedings in relation to both UK and EP(UK) patents. In the case of EP(UK) patents, such revocation proceedings will only affect the UK and will not be Europe wide.

Overall, the opinions service offered by the UKIPO is a useful commercial tool, offering a means of obtaining an independent opinion as to any aspect of patent validity or infringement. Additionally, in the clearest cases of invalidity, the UKIPO opinion service is an attractive option where rapid, cost-effective revocation of a competitor's patent is desired.

Chapman

Helga Chapman

Chapman + Co

Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

Chapman IP, Kings Park House, 22 Kings Park Road

Southampton SO15 2AT, UK

Tel: +44 (0) 23 8000 2022 

info@chapmanip.com  

www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Managing IP’s Max Walters appeared on the latest episode of ‘Two IPs in a pod’, a regular podcast hosted by the UK patent attorney body, to discuss AI, awards and more
Sources at law firms say they have spent more than three years waiting for IP regulations and explain how the delay is affecting their business
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Managing IP will host a ceremony in London on April 11 to reveal the winners of the EMEA Awards 2024
Lawyers reveal what trends they have noticed in the Western District of Texas and the advice they have been giving clients as a result
Concerns over the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation are based on little empirical support, say Benno Buehler and Kilian Mueller of Charles River Associates
Gift this article