United Kingdom: Early certainty of patentability
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

United Kingdom: Early certainty of patentability

The UKIPO has adopted a number of procedures to provide applicants with a good idea of the chance of successful grant within the first few months from filing. This early certainty is helpful when utilising PPH and managing a global family of patents. The EPO is also well-known for its rigorous approach to the examination of patent applications, and as such a granted European patent is considered to be a valuable and high-quality asset. However, in the past this detailed level of search and examination has sometimes led to delays in the prosecution process, which have been frustrating for both applicants and third parties, and have resulted in a lack of legal certainty. Such delays can be particularly problematic in view of the trend for shortening product lifecycles.

The EPO has now addressed this issue with the implementation of its Early Certainty programme, which sets targets for both the search and examination stages of prosecution.

In relation to the search stage, the target is for the search report and written opinion to be issued within six months of receipt of the application, whether the application is a direct filing or a PCT filing that has entered regional phase processing at the EPO. The EPO is now reporting that this target is being met for practically all applications and that the search backlog has largely been cleared.

In relation to the examination stage, the aim is for the period between the filing of a request for examination and the issuance of a notice of allowance to be reduced to an average of 12 months. The EPO hopes to achieve this target by 2020.

This improvement in output has largely been achieved through the recruitment of additional examiners and the redeployment of existing personnel to examination tasks. Additionally, examiners' workflows have been streamlined in order to increase efficiency, and increased dialogue between examiners and applicants has been encouraged. Quality assurance processes have been implemented to ensure that the improvement in output is not achieved at the expense of standards.

Chapman

Helga Chapman

Chapman + Co

Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys

Chapman IP, Kings Park House, 22 Kings Park Road

Southampton SO15 2AT, UK

Tel: +44 (0) 23 8000 2022 

info@chapmanip.com  

www.chapmanip.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners and other senior leaders must step up if they want diverse talent at their firms to thrive
European and US counsel reveal why they are (or aren't) concerned about patent quality and explain how external counsel can help
Firms such as Bird & Bird and Taylor Wessing have reported rising profits and highlighted the role of high-profile IP disputes and hires
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers in the corporate and IP practices discuss where the firm can steal a march on competitors, its growth plans in London, and why deal lawyers are ‘concertmasters’
Kathleen Gaynor, DEI specialist at Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick, says deliberate actions can help law firms reach diversity goals
Scott McKeown, who moved to Wolf Greenfield one year ago, says the change has helped him tap into life sciences work and advise more patent owners
The winners of our Asia-Pacific Awards 2024 will be revealed during a ceremony in Malaysia on September 26
Zach Piccolomini of Wolf Greenfield explains how to maximise your IP portfolio’s value while keeping an eye on competitors
Witnesses at a Congressional hearing debated whether reforming the ITC is necessary and considered what any changes should look like
Gift this article