Turkey: Plain packaging: an overview

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Turkey: Plain packaging: an overview

Plain packaging has become a hot topic in Turkey as controlling the consumption of tobacco has been one of the top priorities of the Turkish government. The government has adopted the 2015-2018 National Programme and Action Plan for Tobacco Control, which stipulates the implementation of necessary provisions related to plain packaging into the relevant legislation.

The Ministry of Health added a provision in relation to standardised packaging to the draft omnibus bill in 2016. However, the Ministry later announced the removal of the provision based on the reason that it has been adopted by Australia only, the efficiency of this measure is debatable and there is a possibility of facing lawsuits by tobacco companies based on the international trade laws as reported by the Turkish media. Although there is no legislation introduced by the government so far, considering the new announcements made by the Minister of Health, plain packaging is expected to be adopted, in the light of the decisions of some countries which adopted laws with such provisions and studies proving the efficiency of the measure.

Beside the uncertainty about whether plain packaging will be adopted, several arguments have been raised on how it will affect the trade mark law. Proponents of plain packaging could argue that the removal of colourful elements from tobacco packs due to standardised packaging is compatible with Article 5/1 (f) of the Turkish Industrial Property Code, which stipulates that signs that are capable of misleading the public about the nature, quality and geographical origin of the goods and services cannot be registered, since those colourful signs – especially the ones in light colours – can be deceptive and create an impression that a particular tobacco is less hazardous than others.

On the other hand, it could be also argued that plain packaging jeopardises the function of trade marks of indicating the origin of goods and prevents the customers from making choices by distinguishing the goods of one company from the goods of other companies, which is the fundamental function of a trade mark. It might be also asserted that standardising the appearance of the tobacco packs and limiting the use of trade marks only to standard texts risks brand image. In addition to these, although it is stated that trade marks can still be registered despite the plain packaging implementations, opponents could argue that standardised packaging annihilates the right of the owners to enjoy and use their trade marks in the form they are registered. Considering the Turkish government's determination to prevent prevalence of tobacco consumption, it is likely that Turkey will soon introduce plain packaging as a tool to control tobacco use. However, the effect of this measure to the trade mark law seems to continue to be a hot topic for discussion in Turkey in the coming years.

Uğur Aktekin

Mutlu Yıldırım Köse

Gün + Partners

Kore Şehitleri Cad. 17

Zincirlikuyu 34394

İstanbul, Turkey

Tel: + (90) (212) 354 00 00

Fax: + (90) (212) 274 20 95

gun@gun.av.tr

gun.av.tr

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Gift this article